linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kasan: Fix ordering between MTE tag colouring and page->flags
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 16:45:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yo5PAJTI7CwxVZ/q@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZe0t_P_crBLaNJHMqTM1ip1PeR9CNK40REg7vyOW+ViOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 12:20:26AM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 3:01 PM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> > > This will reset the tags for all kinds of GFP_USER allocations, not
> > > only for the ones intended for MAP_ANONYMOUS and RAM-based file
> > > mappings, for which userspace can set tags, right? This will thus
> > > weaken in-kernel MTE for pages whose tags can't even be set by
> > > userspace. Is there a way to deal with this?
> >
> > That's correct, it will weaken some of the allocations where the user
> > doesn't care about MTE.
> 
> Well, while this is unfortunate, I don't mind the change.
> 
> I've left some comments on the patches.

Thanks. I'll update and post at -rc1.

> > > > Since clearing the flags in the arch code doesn't work, try to do this
> > > > at page allocation time by a new flag added to GFP_USER.
> 
> Does this have to be GFP_USER? Can we add new flags to
> GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE instead?
> 
> For instance, Peter added __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_POISON to
> GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE in c275c5c6d50a0.

The above commit was a performance improvement. Here we need to address
the correctness. However, looking through the GFP_USER cases, I don't
think any of them is at risk of ending up in user space with PROT_MTE.
There are places where GFP_USER is passed to kmalloc() for in-kernel
objects that would never be mapped to user, though the new gfp flag
won't be taken into account.

I'm ok to move the new flag to the GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE but probably
still keep a page_kasan_tag_reset() on the set_pte_at() path together
with a WARN_ON_ONCE() if we miss anything.

> > > > Could we
> > > > instead add __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON rather than a new flag?
> 
> Adding __GFP_SKIP_KASAN_UNPOISON makes sense, but we still need to
> reset the tag in page->flags.

My thought was to reset the tag in page->flags based on 'unpoison'
alone without any extra flags. We use this flag for vmalloc() pages but
it seems we don't reset the page tags (as we do via
kasan_poison_slab()).

-- 
Catalin


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-25 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-17 18:09 Catalin Marinas
2022-05-17 18:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: kasan: Ensure the tags are visible before the tag in page->flags Catalin Marinas
2022-05-21 22:14   ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-17 18:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm: kasan: Reset the tag on pages intended for user Catalin Marinas
2022-05-21 22:15   ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-17 18:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: kasan: Revert "arm64: mte: reset the page tag in page->flags" Catalin Marinas
2022-05-21 22:16   ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-19 21:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] kasan: Fix ordering between MTE tag colouring and page->flags Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-20 13:01   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-21 22:20     ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-25 15:45       ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-05-25 17:41         ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-05-26 12:24           ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-31 17:16             ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-06-09 18:32               ` Catalin Marinas
2022-06-09 18:40                 ` Andrey Konovalov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yo5PAJTI7CwxVZ/q@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox