linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: liam.howlett@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org,
	walken.cr@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Memory allocation on speculative fastpaths
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 18:04:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnFSfc8BR8CadOtw@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220503155913.GA1187610@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

On Tue 03-05-22 08:59:13, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Just following up from off-list discussions yesterday.
> 
> The requirements to allocate on an RCU-protected speculative fastpath
> seem to be as follows:
> 
> 1.	Never sleep.
> 2.	Never reclaim.
> 3.	Leave emergency pools alone.
> 
> Any others?
> 
> If those rules suffice, and if my understanding of the GFP flags is
> correct (ha!!!), then the following GFP flags should cover this:
> 
> 	__GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN

GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN
 
> Or is this just a fancy way of always returning NULL or some such?  ;-)

It could fail quite easily. We would also want to guarantee (by
documenting I guess) that the page allocator never does anything that
would depend or invoke rcu_synchronize or something like that.

I believe this is the case currently.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-03 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-03 15:59 Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-03 16:04 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2022-05-03 16:39   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-03 18:28     ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-03 23:15       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2022-05-03 23:45         ` Michal Hocko
2022-05-04  0:22           ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-04 16:23         ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-24 20:37           ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-05-25 13:12             ` Johannes Weiner
2022-05-04  8:20       ` Michel Lespinasse
2022-05-04 16:52         ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YnFSfc8BR8CadOtw@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=walken.cr@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox