linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com,
	hughsient@gmail.com, alex.bazhaniuk@eclypsium.com,
	alison.schofield@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] mm/memblock: Tag memblocks with crypto capabilities
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:10:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmeM5fklUssR/74e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220425171526.44925-2-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>

On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 02:15:19PM -0300, Martin Fernandez wrote:
> Add the capability to mark regions of the memory memory_type able of
> hardware memory encryption.
> 
> Also add the capability to query if all regions of a memory node are
> able to do hardware memory encryption to call it when initializing the
> nodes. Warn the user if a node has both encryptable and
> non-encryptable regions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memblock.h |  5 ++++
>  mm/memblock.c            | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 50ad19662a32..00c4f1a20335 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ extern unsigned long long max_possible_pfn;
>   * via a driver, and never indicated in the firmware-provided memory map as
>   * system RAM. This corresponds to IORESOURCE_SYSRAM_DRIVER_MANAGED in the
>   * kernel resource tree.
> + * @MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE: capable of hardware encryption
>   */
>  enum memblock_flags {
>  	MEMBLOCK_NONE		= 0x0,	/* No special request */
> @@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ enum memblock_flags {
>  	MEMBLOCK_MIRROR		= 0x2,	/* mirrored region */
>  	MEMBLOCK_NOMAP		= 0x4,	/* don't add to kernel direct mapping */
>  	MEMBLOCK_DRIVER_MANAGED = 0x8,	/* always detected via a driver */
> +	MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE = 0x10,	/* capable of hardware encryption */
>  };
>  
>  /**
> @@ -120,6 +122,9 @@ int memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>  void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
>  bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
>  			      phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +bool memblock_node_is_crypto_capable(int nid);
> +int memblock_mark_crypto_capable(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +int memblock_clear_crypto_capable(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>  int memblock_mark_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>  int memblock_clear_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
>  int memblock_mark_mirror(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index e4f03a6e8e56..fe62f81572e6 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,40 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
>  	return i < type->cnt;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * memblock_node_is_crypto_capable - get if whole node is capable
> + * of encryption
> + * @nid: number of node
> + *
> + * Iterate over all memory memblock_type and find if all regions under
> + * node @nid are capable of hardware encryption.
> + *
> + * Return:
> + * true if every region in memory memblock_type is capable of

I'd s/in memory memblock_type/in @nid

> + * encryption, false otherwise.
> + */
> +bool __init_memblock memblock_node_is_crypto_capable(int nid)
> +{
> +	struct memblock_region *region;
> +	int crypto_capables = 0;
> +	int not_crypto_capables = 0;
> +
> +	for_each_mem_region(region) {
> +		if (memblock_get_region_node(region) == nid) {
> +			if (region->flags & MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE)
> +				crypto_capables++;
> +			else
> +				not_crypto_capables++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (crypto_capables > 0 && not_crypto_capables > 0)
> +		pr_warn("Node %d has %d regions that are encryptable and %d regions that aren't",
> +			nid, not_crypto_capables, crypto_capables);
> +
> +	return not_crypto_capables == 0;

This will return true for memoryless nodes as well. Do you mean to consider
them as capable of encryption?

> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * __memblock_find_range_bottom_up - find free area utility in bottom-up
>   * @start: start of candidate range
> @@ -891,6 +925,34 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_setclr_flag(phys_addr_t base,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * memblock_mark_crypto_capable - Mark memory regions capable of hardware
> + * encryption with flag MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE.
> + * @base: the base phys addr of the region
> + * @size: the size of the region
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> + */
> +int __init_memblock memblock_mark_crypto_capable(phys_addr_t base,
> +						 phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> +	return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 1, MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * memblock_clear_crypto_capable - Clear flag MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO for a
> + * specified region.
> + * @base: the base phys addr of the region
> + * @size: the size of the region
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> + */
> +int __init_memblock memblock_clear_crypto_capable(phys_addr_t base,
> +						  phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> +	return memblock_setclr_flag(base, size, 0, MEMBLOCK_CRYPTO_CAPABLE);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * memblock_mark_hotplug - Mark hotpluggable memory with flag MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG.
>   * @base: the base phys addr of the region
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-26  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-25 17:15 [PATCH v7 0/8] x86: Show in sysfs if a memory node is able to do encryption Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] mm/memblock: Tag memblocks with crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26  6:10   ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2022-04-26 12:59     ` Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26 13:20       ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-26 13:25         ` Daniel Gutson
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] mm/mmzone: Tag pg_data_t " Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26  6:16   ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] x86/e820: Add infrastructure to refactor e820__range_{update,remove} Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] x86/e820: Refactor __e820__range_update Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] x86/e820: Refactor e820__range_remove Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26 15:10   ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-26 17:37     ` Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26 17:55       ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] x86/e820: Tag e820_entry with crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] x86/efi: Mark e820_entries as crypto capable from EFI memmap Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:15 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] drivers/node: Show in sysfs node's crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-04-26  6:16   ` Mike Rapoport
2022-04-26 13:01     ` Martin Fernandez
2022-04-25 17:23 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] x86: Show in sysfs if a memory node is able to do encryption Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YmeM5fklUssR/74e@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.bazhaniuk@eclypsium.com \
    --cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=hughsient@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox