From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, smuchun@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: slab: optimize memcg_slab_free_hook()
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:25:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yme6lFrVj8FHegjN@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74f6b949-f9f-deb1-2786-47c92a619fd8@google.com>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 12:42:23PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, Muchun Song wrote:
>
> > Most callers of memcg_slab_free_hook() already know the slab, which could
> > be passed to memcg_slab_free_hook() directly to reduce the overhead of an
> > another call of virt_to_slab(). For bulk freeing of objects, the call of
> > slab_objcgs() in the loop in memcg_slab_free_hook() is redundant as well.
> > Rework memcg_slab_free_hook() and build_detached_freelist() to reduce
> > those unnecessary overhead and make memcg_slab_free_hook() can handle bulk
> > freeing in slab_free().
> >
>
> I agree that for the SLUB case the code flows better after this, but I'm
> wondering if you have any numbers to share on how much better this is once
> we've avoided the virt_to_slab() calls?
>
> IOW, I'm struggling to figure out if this is code cleanup or a performance
> optimization.
>
I think it is both. The numbers are listed in another thread [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Yme5zE8ZU%2FFN63Av@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net/T/#m7e5c4ae3e92128781664b3396ce300c8076a5b63
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-25 3:54 Muchun Song
2022-04-25 19:42 ` David Rientjes
2022-04-26 9:25 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2022-04-26 2:27 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-04-26 9:22 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yme6lFrVj8FHegjN@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net \
--to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=smuchun@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox