From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Changhui Zhong <czhong@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] block: avoid io timeout in case of sync polled dio
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:19:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yl0e/YBPGydwVAE7@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418051234.GA3559@lst.de>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 07:12:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 05:03:35PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Yes. But not doing this automatically also means you keep easily
> > > forgetting callsites. For example iomap still does not flush the plug
> > > in your patch.
> >
> > It is reasonable for flush user(usually submission) to be responsible
> > for finishing/flushing plug.
>
> Well, I very much disagree here. blk_flush_plug is not a publіc,
> exported API, and that is for a reason. A bio submission interface
> that requires flushing the plug to be useful is rather broken.
But there isn't any such users from module now. Maybe never, since sync
polled dio becomes legacy after io_uring is invented.
Do we have such potential use case in which explicit flush plug is
needed except for polled io in __blkdev_direct_IO_simple() and swap_readpage()?
If there is, I am happy to add one flag for bypassing plug in blk core
code.
>
> > iomap is one good example to show this point, since it does flush the plug
> > before call bio_poll(), see __iomap_dio_rw().
>
> iomap does not do a manual plug flush anywhere.
>
> iomap does finish the plug before polling, which makes sense.
>
> Now of course __blkdev_direct_IO_simple doesn't even use a plug
> to start with, so I'm wondering what plug this patch even tries
> to flush?
At least blkdev_write_iter(), and __swap_writepage() might call
into ->direct_IO with one plug too.
Not mention loop driver can call into ->direct_IO directly, and we
should have applied plug for batching submission in loop_process_work().
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-18 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-15 3:47 Ming Lei
2022-04-15 5:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-15 11:00 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-16 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-16 9:03 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-18 5:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 8:19 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-04-19 5:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-19 7:47 ` Ming Lei
2022-04-19 8:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yl0e/YBPGydwVAE7@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=czhong@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox