linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy: fix potential mpol_new leak in shared_policy_replace
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:59:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yjg+hVuJBPGhkfeJ@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36b0ea44-39ab-bc52-1ae5-eca2cf832900@huawei.com>

On Sat 19-03-22 18:42:33, Miaohe Lin wrote:
[...]
> This would be triggered easily with below code snippet in my virtual machine:
> 
> 	shmid = shmget((key_t)5566, 1024 * PAGE_SIZE, 0666|IPC_CREAT);
> 	shm = shmat(shmid, 0, 0);
> 	loop {
> 		mbind(shm, 1024 * PAGE_SIZE, MPOL_LOCAL, mask, maxnode, 0);
> 		mbind(shm + 128 * PAGE_SIZE, 128 * PAGE_SIZE, MPOL_DEFAULT, mask, maxnode, 0);
> 	}
> 
> If there're many process doing the above work, mpol_new will be leaked easily.
> So should I resend this patch with Cc stable? But it seems I'am not supposed
> to make this decision and the maintainer will take care of this?

I would just add
Fixes: 42288fe366c4 ("mm: mempolicy: Convert shared_policy mutex to spinlock")
Cc: stable # 3.8

And also add your above reproducer snippet added to the original changelog.
This would be more then enough to conclude the importance.

Thank you for working hard on this!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-21  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-11  9:36 Miaohe Lin
2022-03-14 16:44 ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-15 13:42   ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-15 15:27     ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-16  6:39       ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-16  9:56         ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-17  2:05           ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-17  9:03             ` Michal Hocko
2022-03-17  9:34               ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-19 10:42                 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-21  8:59                   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2022-03-21  9:25                     ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yjg+hVuJBPGhkfeJ@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox