From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com,
Nicholas Tang <nicholas.tang@mediatek.com>,
Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: fix race between lock page and clear PG_Isolated
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 17:43:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjDQRdShE6syVSnM@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cb789a5-c49c-f095-1f7e-67be65ba508a@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:45:13PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 15.03.22 05:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:05:15 +0800 Andrew Yang <andrew.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> >> When memory is tight, system may start to compact memory for large
> >> continuous memory demands. If one process tries to lock a memory page
> >> that is being locked and isolated for compaction, it may wait a long time
> >> or even forever. This is because compaction will perform non-atomic
> >> PG_Isolated clear while holding page lock, this may overwrite PG_waiters
> >> set by the process that can't obtain the page lock and add itself to the
> >> waiting queue to wait for the lock to be unlocked.
> >>
> >> CPU1 CPU2
> >> lock_page(page); (successful)
> >> lock_page(); (failed)
> >> __ClearPageIsolated(page); SetPageWaiters(page) (may be overwritten)
> >> unlock_page(page);
> >>
> >> The solution is to not perform non-atomic operation on page flags while
> >> holding page lock.
> >
> > Sure, the non-atomic bitop optimization is really risky and I suspect
> > we reach for it too often. Or at least without really clearly
> > demonstrating that it is safe, and documenting our assumptions.
>
> I agree. IIRC, non-atomic variants are mostly only safe while the
> refcount is 0. Everything else is just absolutely fragile.
We could add an assertion ... I just tried this:
+++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
@@ -342,14 +342,16 @@ static __always_inline \
void __folio_set_##lname(struct folio *folio) \
{ __set_bit(PG_##lname, folio_flags(folio, FOLIO_##policy)); } \
static __always_inline void __SetPage##uname(struct page *page) \
-{ __set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); }
+{ VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(atomic_read(&policy(page, 1)->_refcount), page); \
+ __set_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); }
#define __CLEARPAGEFLAG(uname, lname, policy) \
static __always_inline \
void __folio_clear_##lname(struct folio *folio) \
{ __clear_bit(PG_##lname, folio_flags(folio, FOLIO_##policy)); } \
static __always_inline void __ClearPage##uname(struct page *page) \
-{ __clear_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); }
+{ VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(atomic_read(&policy(page, 1)->_refcount), page); \
+ __clear_bit(PG_##lname, &policy(page, 1)->flags); }
#define TESTSETFLAG(uname, lname, policy) \
static __always_inline \
... but it dies _really_ early:
(gdb) bt
#0 0xffffffff820055e5 in native_halt ()
at ../arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:57
#1 halt () at ../arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:98
#2 early_fixup_exception (regs=regs@entry=0xffffffff81e03cf8,
trapnr=trapnr@entry=6) at ../arch/x86/mm/extable.c:283
#3 0xffffffff81ff243c in do_early_exception (regs=0xffffffff81e03cf8,
trapnr=6) at ../arch/x86/kernel/head64.c:419
#4 0xffffffff81ff214f in early_idt_handler_common ()
at ../arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:417
#5 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
and honestly, I'm not sure how to debug something that goes wrong this
early. Maybe I need to make that start warning 5 seconds after boot
or only if we're not in pid 1, or something ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-15 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220315030515.20263-1-andrew.yang@mediatek.com>
2022-03-15 3:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-21 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2022-03-15 4:21 ` Andrew Morton
2022-03-15 15:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 17:43 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-03-15 19:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-15 20:34 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YjDQRdShE6syVSnM@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.yang@mediatek.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=nicholas.tang@mediatek.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=william.kucharski@oracle.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox