From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com>,
Pedro Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 10/15] mm/page-flags: reuse PG_slab as PG_anon_exclusive for PageAnon() pages
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:02:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yiu400H9JNtC03Co@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0bd6f52-7bb5-0c32-75c8-2c7c592c2d6d@redhat.com>
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 07:46:39PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> I'm currently testing with the following. My tests so far with a swapfile on
> all different kinds of weird filesystems (excluding networking fs, though)
> revealed no surprises so far:
I like this a lot better than reusing PG_swap. Thanks!
I'm somewhat reluctant to introduce a new flag that can be set on tail
pages. Do we lose much if it's always set only on the head page?
> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> @@ -142,6 +142,60 @@ enum pageflags {
>
> PG_readahead = PG_reclaim,
>
> + /*
> + * Depending on the way an anonymous folio can be mapped into a page
> + * table (e.g., single PMD/PUD/CONT of the head page vs. PTE-mapped
> + * THP), PG_anon_exclusive may be set only for the head page or for
> + * subpages of an anonymous folio.
> + *
> + * PG_anon_exclusive is *usually* only expressive in combination with a
> + * page table entry. Depending on the page table entry type it might
> + * store the following information:
> + *
> + * Is what's mapped via this page table entry exclusive to the
> + * single process and can be mapped writable without further
> + * checks? If not, it might be shared and we might have to COW.
> + *
> + * For now, we only expect PTE-mapped THPs to make use of
> + * PG_anon_exclusive in subpages. For other anonymous compound
> + * folios (i.e., hugetlb), only the head page is logically mapped and
> + * holds this information.
> + *
> + * For example, an exclusive, PMD-mapped THP only has PG_anon_exclusive
> + * set on the head page. When replacing the PMD by a page table full
> + * of PTEs, PG_anon_exclusive, if set on the head page, will be set on
> + * all tail pages accordingly. Note that converting from a PTE-mapping
> + * to a PMD mapping using the same compound page is currently not
> + * possible and consequently doesn't require care.
> + *
> + * If GUP wants to take a reliable pin (FOLL_PIN) on an anonymous page,
> + * it should only pin if the relevant PG_anon_bit is set. In that case,
> + * the pin will be fully reliable and stay consistent with the pages
> + * mapped into the page table, as the bit cannot get cleared (e.g., by
> + * fork(), KSM) while the page is pinned. For anonymous pages that
> + * are mapped R/W, PG_anon_exclusive can be assumed to always be set
> + * because such pages cannot possibly be shared.
> + *
> + * The page table lock protecting the page table entry is the primary
> + * synchronization mechanism for PG_anon_exclusive; GUP-fast that does
> + * not take the PT lock needs special care when trying to clear the
> + * flag.
> + *
> + * Page table entry types and PG_anon_exclusive:
> + * * Present: PG_anon_exclusive applies.
> + * * Swap: the information is lost. PG_anon_exclusive was cleared.
> + * * Migration: the entry holds this information instead.
> + * PG_anon_exclusive was cleared.
> + * * Device private: PG_anon_exclusive applies.
> + * * Device exclusive: PG_anon_exclusive applies.
> + * * HW Poison: PG_anon_exclusive is stale and not changed.
> + *
> + * If the page may be pinned (FOLL_PIN), clearing PG_anon_exclusive is
> + * not allowed and the flag will stick around until the page is freed
> + * and folio->mapping is cleared.
> + */
... I also don't think this is the right place for this comment. Not
sure where it should go.
> +static __always_inline void SetPageAnonExclusive(struct page *page)
> +{
> + VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(!PageAnon(page) || PageKsm(page), page);
hm. seems to me like we should have a PageAnonNotKsm which just
does
return ((unsigned long)page->mapping & PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS) ==
PAGE_MAPPING_ANON;
because that's "a bit" inefficient. OK, that's just a VM_BUG_ON,
but we have other users in real code:
mm/migrate.c: if (PageAnon(page) && !PageKsm(page))
mm/page_idle.c: need_lock = !PageAnon(page) || PageKsm(page);
mm/rmap.c: if (!is_locked && (!PageAnon(page) || PageKsm(page))) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-11 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-08 14:14 [PATCH v1 00/15] mm: COW fixes part 2: reliable GUP pins of anonymous pages David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 01/15] mm/rmap: fix missing swap_free() in try_to_unmap() after arch_unmap_one() failed David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 02/15] mm/hugetlb: take src_mm->write_protect_seq in copy_hugetlb_page_range() David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] mm/memory: slightly simplify copy_present_pte() David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and page_try_dup_anon_rmap() David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] mm/rmap: convert RMAP flags to a proper distinct rmap_t type David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 17:15 ` Nadav Amit
2022-03-08 17:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 18:24 ` Nadav Amit
2022-03-08 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] mm/rmap: remove do_page_add_anon_rmap() David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 07/15] mm/rmap: pass rmap flags to hugepage_add_anon_rmap() David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] mm/rmap: drop "compound" parameter from page_add_new_anon_rmap() David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] mm/rmap: use page_move_anon_rmap() when reusing a mapped PageAnon() page exclusively David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] mm/page-flags: reuse PG_slab as PG_anon_exclusive for PageAnon() pages David Hildenbrand
2022-03-09 15:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-09 16:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-09 17:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-09 18:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-11 18:46 ` David Hildenbrand
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wjWx_bPBLB=qMMae8Sy3KrO+Kvaf4juPknO5HX-+Ot0XQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-03-11 19:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-11 21:11 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-12 8:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-11 21:02 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-03-12 8:26 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] mm: remember exclusively mapped anonymous pages with PG_anon_exclusive David Hildenbrand
2022-03-11 18:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] mm/gup: disallow follow_page(FOLL_PIN) David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing of anonymous pages David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] mm/gup: trigger FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE when R/O-pinning a possibly shared anonymous page David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:14 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] mm/gup: sanity-check with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM that anonymous pages are exclusive when (un)pinning David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 14:19 ` [PATCH v1 00/15] mm: COW fixes part 2: reliable GUP pins of anonymous pages David Hildenbrand
2022-03-08 21:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-09 8:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-03-10 11:13 ` Oded Gabbay
2022-03-10 11:57 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yiu400H9JNtC03Co@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=oded.gabbay@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pedrodemargomes@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=zhangliang5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox