From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Matthew WilCox <willy@infradead.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/slub: refactor deactivate_slab()
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 03:58:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YibUbZeTSqMyE2rM@ip-172-31-19-208.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07d4f687-544f-17d4-51cd-7b86aa23fb21@suse.cz>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 3/7/22 08:40, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > Simplify deactivate_slab() by unlocking n->list_lock and retrying
> > cmpxchg_double() when cmpxchg_double() fails, and perform
> > add_{partial,full} only when it succeed.
> >
> > Releasing and taking n->list_lock again here is not harmful as SLUB
> > avoids deactivating slabs as much as possible.
> >
> > [ vbabka@suse.cz: perform add_{partial,full} when cmpxchg_double()
> > succeed.
> >
> > count deactivating full slabs even if debugging flag is not set. ]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>
> adding both to slab-next. Fixed up some nits myself, see below:
>
> >
> > @@ -2420,61 +2416,50 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> > new.frozen = 0;
> >
> > if (!new.inuse && n->nr_partial >= s->min_partial)
> > - m = M_FREE;
> > + mode = M_FREE;
> > else if (new.freelist) {
>
> This was against kernel style even before the patch - we use { } in the
> 'else if' branch, thus all branches should use { } even if one-line.
>
Ah, you are right. Agree with this change.
"Remove unnecessary brace" rule does not apply here.
> > - m = M_PARTIAL;
> > - if (!lock) {
> > - lock = 1;
> > - /*
> > - * Taking the spinlock removes the possibility that
> > - * acquire_slab() will see a slab that is frozen
> > - */
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > - }
> > - } else {
> > - m = M_FULL;
> > - if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_STORE_USER) && !lock) {
> > - lock = 1;
> > - /*
> > - * This also ensures that the scanning of full
> > - * slabs from diagnostic functions will not see
> > - * any frozen slabs.
> > - */
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
> > - if (l != m) {
> > - if (l == M_PARTIAL)
> > - remove_partial(n, slab);
> > - else if (l == M_FULL)
> > - remove_full(s, n, slab);
> > + mode = M_PARTIAL;
> > + /*
> > + * Taking the spinlock removes the possibility that
> > + * acquire_slab() will see a slab that is frozen
> > + */
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > + } else if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_STORE_USER)) {
> > + mode = M_FULL;
> > + /*
> > + * This also ensures that the scanning of full
> > + * slabs from diagnostic functions will not see
> > + * any frozen slabs.
> > + */
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > + } else
> > + mode = M_FULL_NOLIST;
>
> Ditto here (this is new).
Yes.
>
> > - if (m == M_PARTIAL)
> > - add_partial(n, slab, tail);
> > - else if (m == M_FULL)
> > - add_full(s, n, slab);
> > - }
> >
> > - l = m;
> > if (!cmpxchg_double_slab(s, slab,
> > old.freelist, old.counters,
> > new.freelist, new.counters,
> > - "unfreezing slab"))
> > + "unfreezing slab")) {
> > + if (mode == M_PARTIAL || mode == M_FULL)
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > goto redo;
> > + }
> >
> > - if (lock)
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> >
> > - if (m == M_PARTIAL)
> > + if (mode == M_PARTIAL) {
> > + add_partial(n, slab, tail);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > stat(s, tail);
> > - else if (m == M_FULL)
> > - stat(s, DEACTIVATE_FULL);
> > - else if (m == M_FREE) {
> > + } else if (mode == M_FREE) {
> > stat(s, DEACTIVATE_EMPTY);
> > discard_slab(s, slab);
> > stat(s, FREE_SLAB);
> > - }
> > + } else if (mode == M_FULL) {
> > + add_full(s, n, slab);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> > + stat(s, DEACTIVATE_FULL);
> > + } else if (mode == M_FULL_NOLIST)
> > + stat(s, DEACTIVATE_FULL);
>
> And here.
>
Yes.
> > }
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
>
Thanks!
--
Thank you, You are awesome!
Hyeonggon :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-08 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-07 7:40 [PATCH v3 0/2] slab cleanups Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-03-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/slub: limit number of node partial slabs only in cache creation Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-03-08 4:48 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-03-07 7:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm/slub: refactor deactivate_slab() Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-03-07 16:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-03-08 3:58 ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
2022-03-08 1:40 ` Xiongwei Song
2022-03-08 3:50 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2022-03-08 5:29 ` Xiongwei Song
2022-03-08 5:01 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YibUbZeTSqMyE2rM@ip-172-31-19-208.ap-northeast-1.compute.internal \
--to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox