From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nfs: remove reliance on bdi congestion
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:22:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfdkCsxyu0jpo+98@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <164360183350.4233.691070075155620959.stgit@noble.brown>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 03:03:53PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> - .writepage to return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE if WB_SYNC_NONE
> and the flag is set.
Is this actually useful? I ask because Dave Chinner believes
the call to ->writepage in vmscan to be essentially unused.
See commit 21b4ee7029c9, and I had a followup discussion with him
on IRC:
<willy> dchinner: did you gather any stats on how often ->writepage was
being called by pageout() before "xfs: drop ->writepage completely"
was added?
<dchinner> willy: Never saw it on XFS in 3 years in my test environment...
<dchinner> I don't ever recall seeing the memory reclaim guards we put on
->writepage in XFS ever firing - IIRC they'd been there for the best
part of a decade.
<willy> not so much the WARN_ON firing but the case where it actually calls
iomap_writepage
<dchinner> willy: I mean both - I was running with a local patch that warned
on writepage for a long time, regardless of where it was called from.
I can believe things are different for a network filesystem, or maybe
XFS does background writeback better than other filesystems, but it
would be intriguing to be able to get rid of ->writepage altogether
(or at least from pageout(); migrate.c may be a thornier proposition).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-31 4:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-31 4:03 [PATCH 0/3] remove dependence of inode_congested() NeilBrown
2022-01-31 4:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] ceph: remove reliance on bdi congestion NeilBrown
2022-01-31 4:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfs: " NeilBrown
2022-01-31 4:22 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-01-31 4:55 ` NeilBrown
2022-01-31 13:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-31 21:38 ` NeilBrown
2022-01-31 4:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] fuse: " NeilBrown
2022-01-31 4:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-31 4:47 ` NeilBrown
2022-01-31 10:21 ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-01-31 13:12 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-01-31 23:00 ` NeilBrown
2022-02-01 2:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-01 3:28 ` NeilBrown
2022-02-01 4:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-02-07 0:47 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfdkCsxyu0jpo+98@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox