From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB2CC433F5 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1155D6B009A; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:15:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 09DAA6B009B; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:15:19 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E587E6B009C; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:15:18 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0063.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.63]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF336B009A for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 11:15:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin31.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7806492EDB for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:15:18 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79069309116.31.3D7F2EB Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf26.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4926D140032 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:15:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=ca5rmCPEKBrd9tAfJv698O/VSPzWzu2bn5HtLOiJRFQ=; b=s7W05u/tqTbeHiA9zszWfbGSqU 8ETsPfmekohYOTJF2QfZ/08ogoyeHNFxZ0dc2qLGfqO7Mmr6lixUM92ceDIe1PnuWUAhNV0cuapPw 2wNN5HfeoW15y/XN66dgF4+jaxVOK+6zyuuPMnlvxyPPFvxGdmXWN60Urb4opGoWTxJs4+pVMvxBG LYILfmAGq//m0Lg6pdc/cNe+2TBztFBH6QD6A1GEV+irVnGX0Rh+1PIs5e9BhZUEPdTywQTJ4bcIT v8oEEZF2myC9F3Ma9kfVx32tQabjfa+UMx6j0K6MCz1AYbjxAnNZTD3Huqqqk0eMp2FqG//xcUnIT 7Rh31qKw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nCOT2-0032gq-WE; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:14:49 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD1163002C5; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:59:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 977062B3A959E; Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:59:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 15:59:31 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, posk@google.com, avagin@google.com, jannh@google.com, tdelisle@uwaterloo.ca, mark.rutland@arm.com, posk@posk.io Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups Message-ID: References: <20220120155517.066795336@infradead.org> <20220120160822.914418096@infradead.org> <20220121114758.GF20638@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20220121151845.GB22849@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4926D140032 X-Stat-Signature: z7d8su87wgbis34f6b4ucefn7hgobz55 Authentication-Results: imf26.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b="s7W05u/t"; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf26.hostedemail.com: domain of peterz@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=peterz@infradead.org X-Rspam-User: nil X-HE-Tag: 1643127307-759157 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 03:29:56PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Oh how I hate signals... this can get scribbled by a syscall/fault from > sigcontext :/ OK, the below seems to work. I'll see if I can clean it up some. --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h @@ -94,28 +94,44 @@ static inline int syscall_get_arch(struc #else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */ -static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task, - struct pt_regs *regs, - unsigned long *args) +static inline unsigned long +syscall_get_argument(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, int nr) { -# ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION +#ifdef CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION if (task->thread_info.status & TS_COMPAT) { - *args++ = regs->bx; - *args++ = regs->cx; - *args++ = regs->dx; - *args++ = regs->si; - *args++ = regs->di; - *args = regs->bp; + switch (nr) { + case 0: return regs->bx; + case 1: return regs->cx; + case 2: return regs->dx; + case 3: return regs->si; + case 4: return regs->di; + case 5: return regs->bp; + } } else -# endif +#endif { - *args++ = regs->di; - *args++ = regs->si; - *args++ = regs->dx; - *args++ = regs->r10; - *args++ = regs->r8; - *args = regs->r9; + switch (nr) { + case 0: return regs->di; + case 1: return regs->si; + case 2: return regs->dx; + case 3: return regs->r10; + case 4: return regs->r8; + case 5: return regs->r9; + } } + + WARN_ON_ONCE(1); + return 0; +} + +static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task, + struct pt_regs *regs, + unsigned long *args) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) + *args++ = syscall_get_argument(task, regs, i); } static inline int syscall_get_arch(struct task_struct *task) --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1307,6 +1307,9 @@ struct task_struct { struct task_struct *umcg_server; struct umcg_task __user *umcg_server_task; struct page *umcg_server_page; + + unsigned long umcg_stack_pointer; + unsigned int umcg_worker; #endif struct tlbflush_unmap_batch tlb_ubc; --- a/kernel/sched/umcg.c +++ b/kernel/sched/umcg.c @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static int umcg_wait(u64 timo) /* * Blocked case for umcg_sys_exit(), shared with sys_umcg_ctl(). */ -static void umcg_unblock_and_wait(void) +static void umcg_unblock(void) { struct task_struct *tsk = current; struct umcg_task __user *self = READ_ONCE(tsk->umcg_task); @@ -478,15 +478,7 @@ static void umcg_unblock_and_wait(void) umcg_unpin_pages(); - switch (umcg_wait(0)) { - case 0: - case -EINTR: - /* notify_resume will continue the wait after the signal */ - break; - - default: - UMCG_DIE("wait"); - } + /* notify-resume will wait */ tsk->flags |= PF_UMCG_WORKER; } @@ -509,7 +501,7 @@ void umcg_sys_exit(struct pt_regs *regs) return; } - umcg_unblock_and_wait(); + umcg_unblock(); } /* return-to-user path */ @@ -518,11 +510,47 @@ void umcg_notify_resume(struct pt_regs * struct task_struct *tsk = current; struct umcg_task __user *self = tsk->umcg_task; bool worker = tsk->flags & PF_UMCG_WORKER; + u64 timeout = 0; u32 state; + int ret; + + /* + * Unix signals are horrible, but we have to handle them somehow. + * + * - simply discarding a signal breaks userspace so is not an option. + * + * - returning -EINTR and have userspace deal with it is not an option + * since we can be blocked here due to !syscall reasons (page-faults + * for example). But it's also not permissible to have random + * syscalls return -EINTR that didn't before. + * + * - subjecting signal handlers to UMCG would render existing signal + * handler code subject to the whims and latencies of UMCG; given that + * most signal hander code is short and time sensitive, this seems + * undesirable (consider ^C not working because it got delivered to a + * blocked task). + * + * Therefore the chosen path is to exclude signal context from UMCG + * entirely and treat it as unmanaged time. + */ + if (tsk->umcg_stack_pointer) { + if (tsk->umcg_stack_pointer != user_stack_pointer(regs)) + return; + + tsk->umcg_stack_pointer = 0; + worker = tsk->umcg_worker; + tsk->umcg_worker = 0; + + if (worker) { + set_syscall_work(SYSCALL_UMCG); + /* and PF_UMCG_SYSCALL at done */ + } + goto resume; + } /* avoid recursion vs schedule() */ if (worker) - current->flags &= ~PF_UMCG_WORKER; + tsk->flags &= ~PF_UMCG_WORKER; if (get_user(state, &self->state)) UMCG_DIE("get-state"); @@ -554,10 +582,31 @@ void umcg_notify_resume(struct pt_regs * umcg_unpin_pages(); } - switch (umcg_wait(0)) { +resume: + /* + * Hack alert! Since the return-to-user path must resume waiting it + * needs access to the timeout argument and set the return value. + */ + if (syscall_get_nr(tsk, regs) == __NR_umcg_wait) + timeout = syscall_get_argument(tsk, regs, 1); + + ret = umcg_wait(timeout); + switch (ret) { case 0: + break; + case -EINTR: /* we will resume the wait after the signal */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->umcg_stack_pointer); + tsk->umcg_stack_pointer = user_stack_pointer(regs); + tsk->umcg_worker = worker; + clear_task_syscall_work(tsk, SYSCALL_UMCG); + /* implicitly clears PF_UMCG_WORKER with the early exit */ + return; + + case -ETIMEDOUT: + /* must be __NR_umcg_wait */ + regs_set_return_value(regs, ret); break; default: @@ -566,7 +615,7 @@ void umcg_notify_resume(struct pt_regs * done: if (worker) - current->flags |= PF_UMCG_WORKER; + tsk->flags |= PF_UMCG_WORKER; } /** @@ -755,16 +804,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(umcg_wait, u32, flags, u umcg_unpin_pages(); - ret = umcg_wait(timo); - switch (ret) { - case 0: /* all done */ - case -EINTR: /* umcg_notify_resume() will continue the wait */ - ret = 0; - break; - - default: - goto unblock; - } + /* notify-resume will wait */ out: if (worker) tsk->flags |= PF_UMCG_WORKER; @@ -831,7 +871,7 @@ static int umcg_register(struct umcg_tas set_syscall_work(SYSCALL_UMCG); /* hook syscall */ set_thread_flag(TIF_UMCG); /* hook return-to-user */ - umcg_unblock_and_wait(); + umcg_unblock(); } else { if ((ut.state & (UMCG_TASK_MASK | UMCG_TF_MASK)) != UMCG_TASK_RUNNING)