From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D8DC433EF for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5AAA16B00A0; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 05:37:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 559CF6B00A4; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 05:37:36 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 449276B00A5; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 05:37:36 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0070.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3926B6B00A0 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 05:37:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin17.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2792181D2062 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:37:35 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79050314070.17.3BCF412 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) by imf16.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D8B18000E for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:37:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=IPCG7u59l6g4gQfA7/kz26XOwQYj1kTGYtvG8ISDhgk=; b=Akv/koBNrr3moj2wsPZFQCOwVS IU+JXc/VRE1FDa90VZfM8su2uTNUv4TkPxWnaahpiY+xeAv79xFB55Mx7rX9K5nAiYfc+eNfAmiSg hTVLfiOdWn/4mdFWVbtEWAgBlWF2oviic1+frRSQKwWu8hXjl0TdStm5f9m6zBXMntdQBrKBaT0BC BpTpRP3zE1UmycEz0bYQqioC+7HXSEFHEzQHDGrD6AuZlngTzQYAv8fUnKPNj3fcJkTKJ7pxHrFle E0UVt9wm4D4YEydthRAQDU463abbfxg+DkWU2cKVZIiywHEPAYMCKBpNA1Duy1pS1MaJgjPG+W4ye PN6MERiA==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nAUoZ-002Gvy-Ho; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 10:37:11 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 929B03002F1; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:37:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6803421417389; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:37:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:37:08 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Peter Oskolkov Cc: Peter Oskolkov , mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, avagin@google.com, jannh@google.com, tdelisle@uwaterloo.ca Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/3] sched: User Mode Concurency Groups Message-ID: References: <20211214204445.665580974@infradead.org> <20211214205358.701701555@infradead.org> <20211221171900.GA580323@dev-hv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 16D8B18000E X-Stat-Signature: gjnouscgy85q7ykhuk8gem6n3bmfbf5j Authentication-Results: imf16.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=desiato.20200630 header.b="Akv/koBN"; dmarc=none; spf=none (imf16.hostedemail.com: domain of peterz@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.92.199) smtp.mailfrom=peterz@infradead.org X-HE-Tag: 1642675054-170616 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 09:52:30AM -0800, Peter Oskolkov wrote: > Could you, please, post an updated RFC when you have a chance? Thanks! I was working on that, I'll try and get it done today.