From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: don't vmap() invalid page
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 18:56:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YecNTJNIfAd/D9GG@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220118185354.464517-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:53:54AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> vmap() takes struct page *pages as one of arguments, and user may provide
> an invalid pointer, which would lead to DABT at address translation later.
> Currently, kernel checks the pages against NULL. In my case, however, the
> address was not NULL, and was big enough so that the hardware generated
> Address Size Abort.
>
> Interestingly, this abort happens even if copy_from_kernel_nofault() is used,
> which is quite inconvenient for debugging purposes.
>
> This patch adds an arch_vmap_page_valid() helper into vmap() path, so that
> architectures may add arch-specific checks of the pointer passed into vmap.
>
> For arm64, if the page passed to vmap() corresponds to a physical address
> greater than maximum possible value as described in TCR_EL1.IPS register, the
> following table walk would generate Address Size Abort. Instead of creating
> the invalid mapping, kernel will return ERANGE in such situation.
This seems like a very elaborate way of spelling:
pfn_valid(page_to_pfn(page));
which doesn't require any architecture hook. No?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-18 18:53 Yury Norov
2022-01-18 18:56 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2022-01-18 19:04 ` Yury Norov
2022-01-19 9:55 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YecNTJNIfAd/D9GG@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox