From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31292C433EF for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B27356B0072; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:12:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id AD7116B0073; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:12:21 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 99FA36B0074; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:12:21 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0185.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.185]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEDE6B0072 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 11:12:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin28.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7E284CE0 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:12:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79000354482.28.E4948D2 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1E94000F for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AC721126; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:12:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1641485538; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GswLImmejcBJzE34E9NsNUmMkP/vwikx4Qx1uqSJXO0=; b=CYKDxTacSb+lxU2Io5XRNzgzcRRyXMByC0urq7S6nLTf37jzscMEZ7s8Uxrxd/kr+sfmQN i5mBf2co5jf2IFcE619RHbJn85UKQjkvXypoydtr9bAn+NizfMCZWbe9DVRJKKcNcI/yA3 Z45WOvoLPJLl38pYFNJ3gIVqjUmkcaA= Received: from suse.cz (unknown [10.100.201.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E99FA3B81; Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 17:12:16 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Yu Zhao Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Hillf Danton , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman , Michael Larabel , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Ying Huang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, page-reclaim@google.com, x86@kernel.org, Konstantin Kharlamov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] mm: multigenerational lru: aging Message-ID: References: <20220104202227.2903605-1-yuzhao@google.com> <20220104202227.2903605-7-yuzhao@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220104202227.2903605-7-yuzhao@google.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BF1E94000F X-Stat-Signature: o8xewysgkwqp168i87t33n7169aej5so Authentication-Results: imf04.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=CYKDxTac; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass (imf04.hostedemail.com: domain of mhocko@suse.com designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mhocko@suse.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-HE-Tag: 1641485539-356233 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue 04-01-22 13:22:25, Yu Zhao wrote: > +static struct lru_gen_mm_walk *alloc_mm_walk(void) > +{ > + if (!current->reclaim_state || !current->reclaim_state->mm_walk) > + return kvzalloc(sizeof(struct lru_gen_mm_walk), GFP_KERNEL); > + > + return current->reclaim_state->mm_walk; > +} > + > +static void free_mm_walk(struct lru_gen_mm_walk *walk) > +{ > + if (!current->reclaim_state || !current->reclaim_state->mm_walk) > + kvfree(walk); > +} Do I get it right that you are allocating from the reclaim context? What prevents this to completely deplete the memory as the reclaim context is PF_MEMALLOC? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs