From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDC2C433F5 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B7AAA6B0074; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:06:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B26A76B0075; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:06:31 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9C87D6B0078; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:06:31 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0008.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.8]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7676B0074 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:06:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD4A181D2FC9 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:06:31 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78997466982.04.A95B7ED Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCA3A0014 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 21:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id q5so654500ioj.7 for ; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 13:06:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=EolGbdgsNcnhwpXhAEL04icCDLJTUPTjvI9j2SgExNc=; b=hjEtr3Wm65nDdvFeBKPgdi6ecGQx2AMgYvAL1GIG2JFvfaR8bvZfXlr+3C4UNqtgCY tGt3ZR+DCES7x1oweqv+V/SjgIyUD3XBY51D+qf75Jsp5ToIn5bKz+rb8akGq8GGCtM1 7/s4sRtkED0EZ1tg3lSmLccqe9B+JYGumPgJnNSSlCUirczEknhsSFuBlBTHRsdJhneo 4UgUt5FMJDlj2rRm5gQVs814iwNGWTfWnfpoKGZfgk1DcIsnwyTH9WP1mZbR4IuWEzAR uO9IasOlN41P1Yuaf1EzsVl1R0piiDZ99wNbzK7chG/GzLlkDdVEprhucf9ThCq5c326 Pj1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=EolGbdgsNcnhwpXhAEL04icCDLJTUPTjvI9j2SgExNc=; b=MmAyKXtzTJmQxbt9TjllxFRUFTgAEu/hmir2fI7MLkl9ZUuqK0wn+1PD+0UYxC9Eif bhprg4Gd/zlWkCJWPI8nnIfY/tYRKN4Wqf7Yj6n/d3FXCU2tUoRxpn0M6fmOYOei9yhN Y4KvlwXaVxz71V/73lL53yJeAxygAVwwDD1AHLd9e88LIvXdXsUCyhrIwWDt44WtW5lh 1mUAylh0oF92bQ8C30Prqjnp4rQmxo6kLUoXX1KgROvwvKIymfM0ZyQ5e7gCFgwahxkI DwmseVad79xzF/cKV10+58tMvLFsLXdZT4IuDyD7Hf0tGzzFjonBDjN6RIdyhw6mKRHg LNpw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hGFv0ImTg927jQZElwO//gXowUszYi2+DsE6H7n4POqXsjZkO csABwUSPjRBqwh9hrmoYRV5Gkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzylreqnU7T8VfsIRP9gdym6+PSAMgz3s5D6kp+H/7MxNiBwyiVi2f3QxuAuHm3sb7CQnNMDg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:a40a:: with SMTP id c10mr23211642jal.18.1641416788894; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 13:06:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:183:200:5b02:855e:267d:5b0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm22517868iow.33.2022.01.05.13.06.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 05 Jan 2022 13:06:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 14:06:24 -0700 From: Yu Zhao To: SeongJae Park , Borislav Petkov Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Hillf Danton , Jens Axboe , Jesse Barnes , Johannes Weiner , Jonathan Corbet , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman , Michael Larabel , Michal Hocko , Rik van Riel , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , Ying Huang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, page-reclaim@google.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Multigenerational LRU Framework Message-ID: References: <20220105112527.23399-1-sj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220105112527.23399-1-sj@kernel.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9BCA3A0014 X-Stat-Signature: ougep9e8nrte1j1187sscddm9kbut3dn Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=hjEtr3Wm; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com; spf=pass (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of yuzhao@google.com designates 209.85.166.49 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yuzhao@google.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-HE-Tag: 1641416771-74973 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:25:27AM +0000, SeongJae Park wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 03:53:07 -0700 Yu Zhao wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:55:34AM +0000, SeongJae Park wrote: > > > Hi Yu, > > > > > > On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 13:22:19 -0700 Yu Zhao wrote: > [...] > > > I think similar works are already available out of the box with the latest > > > mainline tree, though it might be suboptimal in some cases. > > > > Ok, I will sound harsh because I hate it when people challenge facts > > while having no idea what they are talking about. > > > > Our jobs are help the leadership make best decisions by providing them > > with facts, not feeding them crap. > > I was using the word "similar", to represent this is only for a rough concept > level similarity, rather than detailed facts. But, seems it was not enough, > sorry. Anyway, I will not talk more and thus disturb you having the important > discussion with leaders here, as you are asking. First of all, I want to apologize. I detested what I read, and I still don't like "a rough concept level similarity" sitting next to a factual statement. But as Borislav has reminded me, my tone did cross the line. I should have had used an objective approach to express my (very) different views. I hope that's all water under the bridge now. And I do plan to carry on with what I should have had done.