From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BCEC433F5 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 15:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BA9C26B0071; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 10:06:16 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B59516B0073; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 10:06:16 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A21C76B0074; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 10:06:16 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0099.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.99]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934D26B0071 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 10:06:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin04.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE88886FA for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 15:06:16 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78996559152.04.94DC434 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B92A40024 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 15:05:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:06:05 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1641395167; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7zU5XndrFq1/DafMJeyDTRNBd9Wg4rCfP6rL7TcC+Lc=; b=24kGuqLfhX/BEMR4PTr/BvWPUcn1JGhQ5Zw4BtzQW9OZd3CM2f+BjM5utCwhvxqapFbneX Q2Zwva6OXJ/Bw88fm9pg6NAw+AiQB9zDsQ+3/7M52slVkzO21P+u2Uui4TbRTwjwNJ+JS9 3dztBRTTt6VC9vC4sxj88X5A8zGA+1bu9h6M2vk3qiXQ4Nqqu/+gxO6jmYbE140b8KMMSj 7GmvVZuRAJ6di1/LgAI5Nyvc+VGKnFpZped4B6hsYNZRStWcgCWNkHonRJqErX/cCnxVq7 3jGQZEVDlR6HBqmW3r2XYHD1AO/VPbD9tElTcrw2SrhpyPrfp88mSVI74qEJ9g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1641395167; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7zU5XndrFq1/DafMJeyDTRNBd9Wg4rCfP6rL7TcC+Lc=; b=co63aLbokqKOOwFoxm+1Taneq4FpYk5r/lTtHAduUD3NL3Lq5RIZNn4RQ3QBibFnkuAJ/3 H2ldUGLDfljEIABQ== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Michal =?utf-8?Q?Koutn=C3=BD?= Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Waiman Long , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it. Message-ID: References: <20211222114111.2206248-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20220105145956.GB6464@blackbody.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20220105145956.GB6464@blackbody.suse.cz> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9B92A40024 X-Stat-Signature: uzgfe8itubx8hq4pddq5rtnr8u8hkwqs Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=24kGuqLf; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=co63aLbo; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of bigeasy@linutronix.de designates 193.142.43.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bigeasy@linutronix.de; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linutronix.de X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-HE-Tag: 1641395143-171948 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2022-01-05 15:59:56 [+0100], Michal Koutn=C3=BD wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 12:41:08PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > - lockdep complains were triggered by test_core and test_freezer (both > > had to run): >=20 > This doesn't happen on the patched kernel, correct? I saw it first on the patched kernel (with this series) then went back to the -rc and saw it there, too. > Thanks, > Michal Sebastian