From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: fix race between MADV_FREE reclaim and blkdev direct IO read
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:21:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd3m55+d2edO2I4p@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yd3mfROPwP72QPt3@google.com>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 12:20:13PM -0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
< snip >
> > > slow path with __gup_longterm_unlocked and set_dirty_pages
> > > for them).
> > >
> > > This approach would solve other cases where map userspace
> > > pages into kernel space and then write. Since the write
> > > didn't go through with the process's page table, we will
> > > lose the dirty bit in the page table of the process and
> > > it turns out same problem. That's why I'd like to approach
> > > this.
> > >
> > > If it doesn't work, the other option to fix this specific
> > > case is can't we make pages dirty in advance in DIO read-case?
> > >
> > > When I look at DIO code, it's already doing in async case.
> > > Could't we do the same thing for the other cases?
> > > I guess the worst case we will see would be more page
> > > writeback since the page becomes dirty unnecessary.
> >
> > Marking pages dirty after pinning them is a pre-existing area of
> > problems. See the long-running LWN articles about get_user_pages() [1].
>
> Oh, Do you mean marking page dirty in DIO path is already problems?
^ marking page dirty too late in DIO path
Typo fix.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-05 23:34 Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2022-01-06 23:15 ` Minchan Kim
2022-01-07 0:11 ` Yang Shi
2022-01-07 1:08 ` Yang Shi
2022-01-11 1:34 ` Huang, Ying
2022-01-11 6:48 ` Yu Zhao
2022-01-11 18:54 ` Minchan Kim
2022-01-11 19:29 ` John Hubbard
2022-01-11 20:20 ` Minchan Kim
2022-01-11 20:21 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2022-01-11 21:59 ` Minchan Kim
2022-01-11 23:38 ` John Hubbard
2022-01-12 0:01 ` Minchan Kim
2022-01-12 1:46 ` Huang, Ying
2022-01-12 17:33 ` Minchan Kim
2022-01-12 21:53 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2022-01-12 22:37 ` Minchan Kim
2022-01-13 8:54 ` Huang, Ying
2022-01-13 12:30 ` Huang, Ying
2022-01-13 14:54 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2022-01-13 14:30 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2022-01-13 7:29 ` Yu Zhao
2022-01-14 0:35 ` Minchan Kim
2022-01-31 23:10 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2022-01-13 5:47 ` Huang, Ying
2022-01-13 6:37 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-01-13 8:04 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yd3m55+d2edO2I4p@google.com \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mfo@canonical.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox