linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
	iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_isolation: unset migratetype directly for non Buddy page
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:53:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ycx2b8yla4VzeWWs@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211229033649.2760586-1-chenwandun@huawei.com>

On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 11:36:49AM +0800, Chen Wandun wrote:
> There is no need to try to move_freepages_block for pages that is not
> in buddy in function unset_migratetype_isolate, it can directly set
> migrate type.

The above could benefit from some rephrasing, someting along these lines
maybe?

"In unset_migratetype_isolate(), we can bypass the call to
move_freepages_block() for non-buddy pages"

> 
> It will save a few cpu cycles for some situations such as cma and
> hugetlb when allocating continue pages, in these situation function
> alloc_contig_pages will be called.
> 
> alloc_contig_pages
> 	__alloc_contig_migrate_range
> 	isolate_freepages_range ==> pages has been remove from buddy
> 	undo_isolate_page_range
> 		unset_migratetype_isolate ==> can directly set migratetype
> 
> Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock")
> Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>

I am ok with the "fix", but I don't think this deserves a Fixes tag.
Sure, it can spare some cpu cycles, but besides that, there is no harm
in the actual code unless I missed something.

Others might feel stronger about that.

Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>


-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-29 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-29  3:36 Chen Wandun
2021-12-29 14:53 ` Oscar Salvador [this message]
2022-01-14 20:50 ` Guillaume Tucker
2022-01-17  3:48   ` Chen Wandun
2022-01-17  6:29   ` Chen Wandun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ycx2b8yla4VzeWWs@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chenwandun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox