From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B482C433F5 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 01C176B0071; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 04:46:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F0F566B0078; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 04:46:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DD7236B007B; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 04:46:44 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0050.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.50]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC106B0071 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 04:46:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFF6181AC9C6 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:46:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78941321928.25.7DD6894 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.220.29]) by imf28.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8585C0031 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721921F3A6; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:46:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1640080002; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eDV7ojDA9yacpuD6gn5NMBRe3pB+4RNyWvrkYopERAw=; b=dTcPNyHMy+oRw4ZZNWd43dMs3L8hWRFoTNmNp6rLJI6/04ZPa/sP6/Tl4XTh0DW8mrdD8x emio+RvyJMV6/Ti/de/ivBqgVbFExD1Y7W0ihpgeLG54YTJizPyVAPnHeKyytZYBIm6XJ9 DKKLmt1H32lauo8V73CchSC6viDE+tg= Received: from suse.cz (unknown [10.100.201.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A2CA3B83; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 09:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:46:42 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Alexey Makhalov Cc: Dennis Zhou , Eric Dumazet , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Oscar Salvador , Tejun Heo , Christoph Lameter , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: fix panic in __alloc_pages Message-ID: References: <77BCF61E-224F-435D-8620-670C9E874A9A@vmware.com> <2291C572-3B22-4BE5-8C7A-0D6A4609547B@vmware.com> <7D1564FA-5AC6-47F3-BC5A-A11716CD40F2@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C8585C0031 X-Stat-Signature: y35mdj55fka4jq7kn8guxbj38za1e961 Authentication-Results: imf28.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=dTcPNyHM; spf=pass (imf28.hostedemail.com: domain of mhocko@suse.com designates 195.135.220.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mhocko@suse.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com X-HE-Tag: 1640080003-176891 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue 21-12-21 05:46:16, Alexey Makhalov wrote: > Hi Michal, >=20 > The patchset looks good to me. I didn=E2=80=99t find any issues during = the testing. Thanks a lot. Can I add your Tested-by: tag? > I have one concern regarding dmesg output. Do you think this messaging = is > valid if possible node is not yet present? > Or is it only the issue for virtual machines? >=20 > Node XX uninitialized by the platform. Please report with boot dmesg. > Initmem setup node XX [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000000] AFAIU the Initmem part of the output is what concerns you, right? Yeah, that really is more cryptic than necessary. Does this look any better? diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index 34743dcd2d66..7e18a924be7e 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -7618,9 +7618,14 @@ static void __init free_area_init_node(int nid) pgdat->node_start_pfn =3D start_pfn; pgdat->per_cpu_nodestats =3D NULL; =20 - pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", nid, - (u64)start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, - end_pfn ? ((u64)end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1 : 0); + if (start_pfn !=3D end_pfn) { + pr_info("Initmem setup node %d [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", nid, + (u64)start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, + end_pfn ? ((u64)end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1 : 0); + } else { + pr_info("Initmem setup node %d as memoryless\n", nid); + } + calculate_node_totalpages(pgdat, start_pfn, end_pfn); =20 alloc_node_mem_map(pgdat); --=20 Michal Hocko SUSE Labs