From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page-flags: fix build failure due to missing parameter for HasHWPoisoned flag
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 20:43:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYBRePv3w9cfCpHC@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211101194336.305546-1-shy828301@gmail.com>
Should probbaly cc Linus, and also note that Stephen noticed & fixed
this problem already.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211101174846.2b1097d7@canb.auug.org.au/
I didn't know about it at the time I sent the pull request because it
hadn't been merged at that point.
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 12:43:36PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
> The below build failure when !CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE was reported for
> v5.16 merge window:
> In file included from include/linux/mmzone.h:22,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:6,
> from include/linux/slab.h:15,
> from include/linux/crypto.h:20,
> from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
> include/linux/page-flags.h:806:29: error: macro "PAGEFLAG_FALSE"
> requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given
> 806 | PAGEFLAG_FALSE(HasHWPoisoned)
> | ^
> include/linux/page-flags.h:411: note: macro "PAGEFLAG_FALSE" defined here
> 411 | #define PAGEFLAG_FALSE(uname, lname) TESTPAGEFLAG_FALSE(uname, lname) \
> |
> include/linux/page-flags.h:807:39: error: macro "TESTSCFLAG_FALSE"
> requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given
> 807 | TESTSCFLAG_FALSE(HasHWPoisoned)
> | ^
> include/linux/page-flags.h:414: note: macro "TESTSCFLAG_FALSE" defined here
> 414 | #define TESTSCFLAG_FALSE(uname, lname)
> \
> |
> include/linux/page-flags.h:806:1: error: unknown type name 'PAGEFLAG_FALSE'
> 806 | PAGEFLAG_FALSE(HasHWPoisoned)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/page-flags.h:807:25: error: expected ';' before 'static'
> 807 | TESTSCFLAG_FALSE(HasHWPoisoned)
> | ^
> | ;
> ......
> 815 | static inline bool is_page_hwpoison(struct page *page)
> | ~~~~~~
> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:121: arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
>
> The commit d389a4a81155 ("mm: Add folio flag manipulation functions")
> changed the definition of PAGEFLAG macros, this caused the build failure
> for HasHWPoisoned flag. The new flag was introduced by commit
> eac96c3efdb5 ("mm: filemap: check if THP has hwpoisoned subpage for PMD
> page fault") in v5.15-rc7. But the folio series pull request was
> prepared before v5.15, so this new flag was missed.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/page-flags.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> index d8623d6e1141..981341a3c3c4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> @@ -803,8 +803,8 @@ PAGEFLAG_FALSE(DoubleMap, double_map)
> PAGEFLAG(HasHWPoisoned, has_hwpoisoned, PF_SECOND)
> TESTSCFLAG(HasHWPoisoned, has_hwpoisoned, PF_SECOND)
> #else
> -PAGEFLAG_FALSE(HasHWPoisoned)
> - TESTSCFLAG_FALSE(HasHWPoisoned)
> +PAGEFLAG_FALSE(HasHWPoisoned, has_hwpoisoned)
> + TESTSCFLAG_FALSE(HasHWPoisoned, has_hwpoisoned)
> #endif
>
> /*
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-01 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-01 19:43 Yang Shi
2021-11-01 20:43 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-11-01 21:06 ` Yang Shi
2021-11-01 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YYBRePv3w9cfCpHC@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox