linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, anshuman.khandual@arm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, william.kucharski@oracle.com,
	mike.kravetz@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, geert@linux-m68k.org,
	schmitzmic@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, guro@fb.com, songmuchun@bytedance.com,
	weixugc@google.com, gthelen@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Hardening page _refcount
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 19:23:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YXhHq52jDrU61V4E@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026173822.502506-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 05:38:14PM +0000, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> It is hard to root cause _refcount problems, because they usually
> manifest after the damage has occurred.  Yet, they can lead to
> catastrophic failures such memory corruptions.
> 
> Improve debugability by adding more checks that ensure that
> page->_refcount never turns negative (i.e. double free does not
> happen, or free after freeze etc).
> 
> - Check for overflow and underflow right from the functions that
>   modify _refcount
> - Remove set_page_count(), so we do not unconditionally overwrite
>   _refcount with an unrestrained value
> - Trace return values in all functions that modify _refcount

I think this is overkill.  Won't we get exactly the same protection
by simply testing that page->_refcount == 0 in set_page_count()?
Anything which triggers that BUG_ON would already be buggy because
it can race with speculative gets.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-26 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-26 17:38 Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 17:38 ` [RFC 1/8] mm: add overflow and underflow checks for page->_refcount Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 19:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-26 21:34     ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-27  1:21       ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-27  3:04         ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-27 18:22           ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-27  7:46   ` Muchun Song
2021-10-27 18:22     ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-28  4:08       ` Muchun Song
2021-10-26 17:38 ` [RFC 2/8] mm/hugetlb: remove useless set_page_count() Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 18:44   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-10-26 18:50     ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 21:19       ` Mike Kravetz
2021-10-26 17:38 ` [RFC 3/8] mm: Avoid using set_page_count() in set_page_recounted() Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 17:53   ` John Hubbard
2021-10-26 18:01     ` John Hubbard
2021-10-26 18:14       ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 18:21     ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-27  5:12       ` John Hubbard
2021-10-27 18:27         ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-28  1:20           ` John Hubbard
2021-10-28  1:35             ` John Hubbard
2021-11-01 14:30               ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-11-01 19:35                 ` John Hubbard
2021-11-01 14:22             ` Pasha Tatashin
2021-11-01 19:31               ` John Hubbard
2021-11-01 19:42               ` John Hubbard
2021-10-26 17:38 ` [RFC 4/8] mm: remove set_page_count() from page_frag_alloc_align Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 17:38 ` [RFC 5/8] mm: avoid using set_page_count() when pages are freed into allocator Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 17:38 ` [RFC 6/8] mm: rename init_page_count() -> page_ref_init() Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-27  6:46   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-10-26 17:38 ` [RFC 7/8] mm: remove set_page_count() Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 17:38 ` [RFC 8/8] mm: simplify page_ref_* functions Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 18:23 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-10-26 18:30   ` [RFC 0/8] Hardening page _refcount Pasha Tatashin
2021-10-26 20:13     ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-10-26 21:24       ` Pasha Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YXhHq52jDrU61V4E@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=william.kucharski@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox