From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380C6C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FFF610EA for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:00:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org C5FFF610EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 58C1A6B006C; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:00:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 53B186B0071; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:00:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 42A096B0072; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:00:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0141.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.141]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356DE6B006C for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:00:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9718183E4B66 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:00:48 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78692330976.14.62490EF Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516CD10003C2 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:00:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id o20so11676152wro.3 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:00:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=tZ0DTHwbOklA/q8ADpPUERCncvmwsxaymoMbHXl9IcQ=; b=lN+J43KGo0zUaPFO850xZAG/ULwXxvlMdNWRUPoKoxTcZPFTw2hGwNraEYLIfBpwIy 34t+n19+zMswNCDzVn+UrICgn+NwFsebdGUqYoL6fAFJDaMZ19TQVy35WMi0exwkRsSi XXDx7bc9W9I8WFALhD0SfmuWWLF9ETuyyXgZY+SO1bkCdviV/cIddJGur0obC5f9Nnue rdgO84+KgmEGQKcbxStnvFa0YuQ7wvtqJpJ7/gc6Ajcx4MWVJ2XmCLzuKb5AQ7ZcHj+6 PnbavqqyYXvwB6NZwqcK7WBL1PngTsYFMRS/wCbnKDHBcnkZrR4aL/2Qz6DIjrUXaRoZ 1Iag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=tZ0DTHwbOklA/q8ADpPUERCncvmwsxaymoMbHXl9IcQ=; b=NZnHkURW4eTplkfL2wr3bwppFE/FB22/NetuZpEtu5uuthB4xnR09aF2jvX4lBAUow GjG3xgfQwnFYvqY5TLC2wDtT+Sf6YIcqA5XOKOzPssNP7xKmR3JghmAQLGvTFOsuPBKG av3NUBL8oiuK317I48lwBZfcLOxxNk7G4VutOx0tVWJGmOUD16XVr8KCdo8VvXGCr7IE YiZF5m/6we3d+zYa3oSOTgKI2sCRkj3Lhk83SW7bpB+n8xTPi8VGMQAwvDwrIo/4niif yD9xbDr7mTItQ/yhs/YL2SekCSm5HmwwGM2nKyQFMkXstZTAEx+28OfbXAyhsNB+eE1p KQ1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pYTamZTFKhDd0Caa1JZFLsE8lH8j4hDcFmrcXXD0v4BzclxAD 5MerCzTYTyekpquvB/+bL3A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygIHrAS8lyrk9ykp9uvwEXxHci5Csm+H/Cluuc0t6nT+hNvSeCQjNVUcjNoQPOPxnn/yCKmA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4344:: with SMTP id u4mr1123536wrr.106.1634151647044; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eldamar (80-218-24-251.dclient.hispeed.ch. [80.218.24.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n17sm374014wrq.11.2021.10.13.12.00.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 21:00:45 +0200 From: Salvatore Bonaccorso To: Stephen Cc: djwong@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, seanjc@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@redhat.com, hagen@jauu.net, pbonzini@redhat.com Subject: Re: kvm crash in 5.14.1? Message-ID: References: <85e40141-3c17-1dff-1ed0-b016c5d778b6@gmail.com> <2cd8af17-8631-44b5-8580-371527beeb38@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2cd8af17-8631-44b5-8580-371527beeb38@gmail.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 516CD10003C2 X-Stat-Signature: 8xhnuy1rfuhzxepoc5gje5ggdfqyjifp Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=lN+J43KG; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of salvatore.bonaccorso@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=salvatore.bonaccorso@gmail.com; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-HE-Tag: 1634151648-552896 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000130, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi, On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 12:00:39PM -0700, Stephen wrote: > > I'll try to report back if I see a crash; or in roughly a week if the > system seems to have stabilized. > > Just wanted to provide a follow-up here and say that I've run on both > v5.14.8 and v5.14.9 with this patch and everything seems to be good; no > further crashes or problems. In Debian we got a report as well related to this issue (cf. https://bugs.debian.org/996175). Do you know did the patch felt through the cracks? Regards, Salvatore