linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@openvz.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH memcg] mm/page_alloc.c: avoid statistic update with 0
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:02:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YWV5OY5I0MhTtsn1@chrisdown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f52c5cd3-9b74-0fd5-2b7b-83ca21c52b2a@virtuozzo.com>

Vasily Averin writes:
>Yes, it's not a bug, it just makes the kernel a bit more efficient in a very unlikely case.
>However, it looks strange and makes uninformed code reviewers like me worry about possible
>problems inside the affected functions. No one else calls these functions from 0.

This statement is meaningless without data. If you have proof that it makes the 
kernel more efficient, then please provide the profiles.

As it is I'd be surprised if this improved things. Either the code is hot 
enough that the additional branch is cumbersome, or it's cold enough that it 
doesn't even matter.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-12 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-08  9:24 Vasily Averin
2021-10-08 11:47 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-12 10:42   ` Vasily Averin
2021-10-12 11:09     ` David Hildenbrand
2021-10-12 11:38     ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-12 12:02     ` Chris Down [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YWV5OY5I0MhTtsn1@chrisdown.name \
    --to=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kernel@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox