From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68420C433F5 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7343611C7 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:07:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org D7343611C7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 345FC6B006C; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:07:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 2CE976B0071; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:07:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 195A16B0074; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:07:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0213.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.213]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E736B006C for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 16:07:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin14.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3688249980 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:07:43 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78714272406.14.0F9CF1E Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf24.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3A0B000099 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:07:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=lULRZJ5d3ao6ySUvWKVx/OK5Yxv64Zr2QB+S9ALbnhk=; b=mIpellGqKkgTzWprx+JB2u19Fn W3XjBye8qaIBsuKD1brinKgUFUgTBnm83lFLOi/DJMldVswrTiZ4aLSPKKmLfiTZpN6Hy40tCEGEA Fpf1fzF7/hEPMwoJdNAvKJUzMMUFe6+tJAB6PVXsIs9GA7vJahbqOecOWTbFXZ4YDmLfwpOHbaIlW t9XhNs1dqMoagIj2giLzCvoUrzHgQqEOFJBCuwQOdhrzLZkofdCn06Uww2O40lmR8kGLTrWTBrNT+ jvm8v/4VBD1w9anPxGRNNe76dwmejwwJBWyB0TnXXZJUuqQIlv0GqDDJ/VTYQUgbzh+g3yMKmj3QA u7K/IZCQ==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mcvLv-00Byg0-2k; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 20:05:31 +0000 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 21:04:51 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: David Howells Cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com, Kent Overstreet , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Steve French , Dominique Martinet , Jeff Layton , Alexander Viro , Omar Sandoval , Linus Torvalds , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/67] mm: Stop filemap_read() from grabbing a superfluous page Message-ID: References: <163456861570.2614702.14754548462706508617.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <163456863216.2614702.6384850026368833133.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <2971214.1634669295@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2971214.1634669295@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam06 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7E3A0B000099 X-Stat-Signature: w1jw5ek5xc9bkxzdzjonwu368f4omf7d Authentication-Results: imf24.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=mIpellGq; spf=none (imf24.hostedemail.com: domain of willy@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=willy@infradead.org; dmarc=none X-HE-Tag: 1634674060-215607 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 07:48:15PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > + isize = i_size_read(inode); > > > + if (unlikely(iocb->ki_pos >= isize)) > > > + goto put_pages; > > > + > > > > Is there a good reason to assign to isize here? I'd rather not, > > because it complicates analysis, and a later change might look at > > the isize read here, not realising it was a racy use. So I'd > > rather see: > > If we don't set isize, the loop will never end. Actually, maybe we can just > break out at that point rather than going to put_pages. Umm, yes, of course. Sorry. It makes more sense to just break because we haven't got any pages, so putting pages that we haven't got seems unnecessary. >