From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/smaps: Simplify shmem handling of pte holes
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:40:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVxj753GsZB/m7/J@t490s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4bcf5e1d-cd86-319a-889f-782755955e04@suse.cz>
Hi, Vlastimil,
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:15:05PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Since at it, use the pte_hole() helper rather than dup the page cache lookup.
>
> pte_hole() is for checking a range and we are calling it for single page,
> isnt't that causing larger overhead in the end? There's xarray involved, so
> maybe Matthew will know best.
Per my understanding, pte_hole() calls xas_load() too at last, just like the
old code; it's just that the xas_for_each() of shmem_partial_swap_usage() will
only run one iteration, iiuc.
>
> > Still keep the CONFIG_SHMEM part so the code can be optimized to nop for !SHMEM.
> >
> > There will be a very slight functional change in smaps_pte_entry(), that for
> > !SHMEM we'll return early for pte_none (before checking page==NULL), but that's
> > even nicer.
>
> I don't think this is true, 'unlikely(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SHMEM))' will be a
> compile-time constant false and shortcut the rest of the 'if' evaluation
> thus there will be no page check? Or I misunderstood.
The page check I was referring is this one in smaps_pte_entry():
if (!page)
return;
After the change, with !SHMEM the "else" block will be kept there (unlike the
old code as you mentioned it'll be optimized), the smaps_pte_hole_lookup() will
be noop so it'll be a direct "return" in that "else", then it should return a
bit earlier by not checking "!page" (because in that case pte_none must have
page==NULL).
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-17 16:47 [PATCH 0/3] mm/smaps: Fixes and optimizations on shmem swap handling Peter Xu
2021-09-17 16:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/smaps: Fix shmem pte hole swap calculation Peter Xu
2021-09-22 10:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-17 16:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/smaps: Use vma->vm_pgoff directly when counting partial swap Peter Xu
2021-09-22 10:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-09-17 16:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/smaps: Simplify shmem handling of pte holes Peter Xu
2021-10-05 11:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-05 14:40 ` Peter Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVxj753GsZB/m7/J@t490s \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox