From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, memcg: Don't put offlined memcg into local stock
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:51:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVefHLo1+6lgw3aB@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211001190938.14050-2-longman@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 03:09:36PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> When freeing a page associated with an offlined memcg, refill_stock()
> will put it into local stock delaying its demise until another memcg
> comes in to take its place in the stock. To avoid that, we now check
> for offlined memcg and go directly in this case to the slowpath for
> the uncharge via the repurposed cancel_charge() function.
Hi Waiman!
I'm afraid it can make a cleanup of a dying cgroup slower: for every
released page we'll potentially traverse the whole cgroup tree and
decrease atomic page counters.
I'm not sure I understand the benefits we get from this change which
do justify the slowdown on the cleanup path.
Thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 4b32896d87a2..4568363062c1 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2167,6 +2167,8 @@ static bool consume_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void cancel_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages);
> +
> /*
> * Returns stocks cached in percpu and reset cached information.
> */
> @@ -2178,9 +2180,7 @@ static void drain_stock(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock)
> return;
>
> if (stock->nr_pages) {
> - page_counter_uncharge(&old->memory, stock->nr_pages);
> - if (do_memsw_account())
> - page_counter_uncharge(&old->memsw, stock->nr_pages);
> + cancel_charge(old, stock->nr_pages);
> stock->nr_pages = 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2219,6 +2219,14 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
> struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + /*
> + * An offlined memcg shouldn't be put into stock.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(memcg->kmem_state != KMEM_ONLINE)) {
> + cancel_charge(memcg, nr_pages);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> local_irq_save(flags);
>
> stock = this_cpu_ptr(&memcg_stock);
> @@ -2732,7 +2740,6 @@ static inline int try_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> return try_charge_memcg(memcg, gfp_mask, nr_pages);
> }
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM) || defined(CONFIG_MMU)
> static void cancel_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
> {
> if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> @@ -2742,7 +2749,6 @@ static void cancel_charge(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
> if (do_memsw_account())
> page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
> }
> -#endif
>
> static void commit_charge(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> --
> 2.18.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-01 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-01 19:09 [PATCH 0/3] mm, memcg: Miscellaneous cleanups Waiman Long
2021-10-01 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, memcg: Don't put offlined memcg into local stock Waiman Long
2021-10-01 21:17 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-01 23:06 ` kernel test robot
2021-10-01 23:51 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2021-10-02 1:54 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-31 3:55 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-31 17:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-01-31 17:09 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-31 17:15 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-31 17:19 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-01-31 17:25 ` Waiman Long
2022-01-31 18:00 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-01-31 17:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-10-01 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, memcg: Remove obsolete memcg_free_kmem() Waiman Long
2021-10-02 0:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2021-10-02 2:03 ` Waiman Long
2021-10-01 19:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, memcg: Ensure valid memcg from objcg within a RCU critical section Waiman Long
2021-10-01 20:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2021-10-01 20:34 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YVefHLo1+6lgw3aB@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox