linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: Fix tag for large allocations when using CONFIG_SLAB
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 15:05:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVcVtNLnyJModOhn@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZfSUxToYKUfHwQT0r3bC9NYZNc2iC3PXv+GciuW0Fm79A@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 03:29:29PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 4:42 AM Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
> <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > If an object is allocated on a tail page of a multi-page slab, kasan
> > will get the wrong tagbecause page->s_mem is NULL for tail pages.
> 
> Interesting. Is this a known property of tail pages? Why does this
> happen? I failed to find this exception in the code.

Yes, it's a known property of tail pages.  kmem_getpages() calls
__alloc_pages_node() which returns a pointer to the head page.
All the tail pages are initialised to point to the head page.
Then in alloc_slabmgmt(), we set ->s_mem of the head page, but
we never set ->s_mem of the tail pages.  Instead, we rely on
people always passing in the head page.  I have a patch in the works
to change the type from struct page to struct slab so you can't
make this mistake.  That was how I noticed this problem.

> The tag value won't really be "wrong", just unexpected. But if s_mem
> is indeed NULL for tail pages, your fix makes sense.
> 
> > I'm not quite sure what the user-visible effect of this might be.
> 
> Everything should work, as long as tag values are assigned
> consistently based on the object address.

OK, maybe this doesn't need to be backported then?  Actually, why
subtract s_mem in the first place?  Can we just avoid that for all
tag calculations?


  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-01 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-01  2:41 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2021-10-01 10:30 ` Marco Elver
2021-10-01 13:29 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-10-01 14:05   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2021-10-03 16:27     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-10-03 16:27 ` Andrey Konovalov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YVcVtNLnyJModOhn@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox