From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECC8C433EF for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B74261168 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:35:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 4B74261168 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E3EC86B0072; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 04:35:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DEE61900003; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 04:35:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CB6E3900002; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 04:35:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0198.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.198]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2466B0072 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 04:35:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715A0181BD782 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:35:14 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78614549748.23.67AD6EC Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EA34002091 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EDB22283; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:35:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1632299712; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CUIfUFXAE8nIx3z28JFV6Lwfo6OmUKmXPd+3c/HjPN8=; b=NL5Z9fZaT5y6wQ3jeGCoGamMV6OwX+DhRydn7ASV97N6GjB7TNGRXMD9jH9Q5fsEdMcpof oSceAibAOmaZfTHR7wOtl8tOTK78TJIv6/nsVfmas3Brm5J/kHnu9XfOw73TZxNCXE+Jg6 k2Mcj2lMvudW3/GdrNnTih0Nj2roogM= Received: from suse.cz (unknown [10.100.201.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776EDA3B81; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 10:35:12 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Chen Jun Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, feng.tang@intel.com, rui.xiang@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm: Fix the uninitialized use in overcommit_policy_handler Message-ID: References: <20210922014122.47219-1-chenjun102@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210922014122.47219-1-chenjun102@huawei.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 18EA34002091 X-Stat-Signature: tjm5gwo938y8ciowimckkykgq1e95bsn Authentication-Results: imf18.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=NL5Z9fZa; spf=pass (imf18.hostedemail.com: domain of mhocko@suse.com designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mhocko@suse.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com X-HE-Tag: 1632299713-271134 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed 22-09-21 01:41:22, Chen Jun wrote: > An unexpected value of /proc/sys/vm/panic_on_oom we will get, > after running the following program. > > int main() > { > int fd = open("/proc/sys/vm/panic_on_oom", O_RDWR) > write(fd, "1", 1); > write(fd, "2", 1); > close(fd); > } > > write(fd, "2", 1) will pass *ppos = 1 to proc_dointvec_minmax. > proc_dointvec_minmax will return 0 without setting new_policy. > > t.data = &new_policy; > ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&t, write, buffer, lenp, ppos) > -->do_proc_dointvec > -->__do_proc_dointvec > if (write) { > if (proc_first_pos_non_zero_ignore(ppos, table)) > goto out; > > sysctl_overcommit_memory = new_policy; > > so sysctl_overcommit_memory will be set to an uninitialized value. > > Check whether new_policy has been changed by proc_dointvec_minmax. > > Fixes: 56f3547bfa4d ("mm: adjust vm_committed_as_batch according to vm overcommit policy" > Signed-off-by: Chen Jun Acked-by: Michal Hocko Btw. you could also check for new_policy == sysctl_overcommit_memory so that the sync of pcp counters is not fired without the policy change. Something for a separate patch I guess. > --- > > v2: > * Check whether new_policy has been changed by proc_dointvec_minmax. > > mm/util.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c > index 4ddb6e186dd5..d5be67771850 100644 > --- a/mm/util.c > +++ b/mm/util.c > @@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ int overcommit_policy_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer, > size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) > { > struct ctl_table t; > - int new_policy; > + int new_policy = -1; > int ret; > > /* > @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ int overcommit_policy_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer, > t = *table; > t.data = &new_policy; > ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&t, write, buffer, lenp, ppos); > - if (ret) > + if (ret || new_policy == -1) > return ret; > > mm_compute_batch(new_policy); > -- > 2.17.1 -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs