From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E9FC433EF for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2033861261 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:30:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2033861261 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 4A9F96B0071; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:30:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 43E206B0072; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:30:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 2D2DD900002; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:30:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0176.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.176]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DCB6B0071 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 07:30:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin20.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C144D1837E010 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:30:32 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78589589904.20.8DAA0BE Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4023E10000A8 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005722207D; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:30:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1631705431; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UOkCjvFoaNxGNbGFWeeVQVHJtZCjHhgLPxx+uerfl10=; b=HNke4/c6CnQ8nnlErjOvekgpXVSQXjWl4Ol2+/tLgrRlknDlrVnGAlJb48fXnI99PKyxch OYd1ItE4KjwfkP1Zku3mE76kBPFNJ8txDsFMjiMkJFJOsTZYn4j5Fetseg8i3S8mO1/f1k /jZcCmJ85qh1RlBqZrqrlIGfiLDUXFU= Received: from suse.cz (unknown [10.100.201.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DE1EA3BA3; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:30:27 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Feng Tang Cc: David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , Tejun Heo , Zefan Li , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_alloc: detect allocation forbidden by cpuset and bail out early Message-ID: References: <1631590828-25565-1-git-send-email-feng.tang@intel.com> <3bd87d8a-d09e-ac7-1d1d-25ad1b9d5ed9@google.com> <20210915053247.GG56674@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210915053247.GG56674@shbuild999.sh.intel.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4023E10000A8 X-Stat-Signature: yhnjktsfiqnjbnf1m3j55horaxncmuye Authentication-Results: imf12.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b="HNke4/c6"; spf=pass (imf12.hostedemail.com: domain of mhocko@suse.com designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mhocko@suse.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com X-HE-Tag: 1631705432-479527 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed 15-09-21 13:32:47, Feng Tang wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 05:30:03PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: [...] > > I'm wondering about a single node nodemask, for example, where all > > ZONE_NORMAL memory is hot-removed. While this is theoretically possible it is highly unlikely to happen. Non movable memory just takes one kernel allocation to prevent any hotremove operation to finish. I have to say I was not aware of the hotplug callback. It all seems rather suspicious. I will have a look. Anyway something worth having covered "just in case". Thanks for pointing it out. > Thanks for the reminding! Yes, memory hot remove can change the > cpuset's effective nodemask, we may need to add similar check inside > cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks() which is called by cpuset_hotplug_workfn(), > something like below? > > diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > index 7fa633e..d5f6776 100644 > --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c > @@ -3186,6 +3186,14 @@ static void cpuset_hotplug_update_tasks(struct cpuset *cs, struct tmpmasks *tmp) > cpus_updated = !cpumask_equal(&new_cpus, cs->effective_cpus); > mems_updated = !nodes_equal(new_mems, cs->effective_mems); > > + if (mems_updated && !cpusets_insane_config() && > + movable_only_nodes(new_mems)) { > + static_branch_enable(&cpusets_insane_config_key); > + pr_info("Unsupported (movable nodes only) cpuset configuration detected (nmask=%*pbl) after memory hotplug." > + "Cpuset allocations might fail even with a lot of memory available.\n", > + nodemask_pr_args(new_mems); > + } Please create a helper rather than two copies of the same. Thanks! > + > if (is_in_v2_mode()) > hotplug_update_tasks(cs, &new_cpus, &new_mems, > cpus_updated, mems_updated); > > Thanks, > Feng -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs