From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8465AC433EF for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC89261151 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:06:08 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org EC89261151 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 522E4900002; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:06:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4D2DF6B0071; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:06:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 39A2E900002; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:06:08 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0121.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.121]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275646B006C for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 03:06:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin13.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA97F8249980 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:06:07 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78585294774.13.D1221C3 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDA3D02DFB4 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482AB22036; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:06:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1631603166; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=A/1Y7KiDeeaT0dHdPrBGfhWOk81I7NO2b70BCS+BHrs=; b=ikIlgBpZyivQEZXzhoOi40OPwAkWSBWdnWYZlYTMoY47xOuDzck5UFpfcDqmEtB5TVyDEY dP/BgDGXjeqYybw2BIolssfpfvkxmyL6IMZVnnDRIwmRtQLE27ahOYy/Vo2AgPi7P7AiIa nwn8HC9j7wDdOHmUmxRqEKu6OJdYumM= Received: from suse.cz (unknown [10.100.201.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1B76A3B90; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 07:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 09:06:05 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Miaohe Lin Cc: Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , vbabka@suse.cz, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_isolation: fix potential missing call to unset_migratetype_isolate() Message-ID: References: <20210913115125.33617-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> <6cb372ff-0b68-2143-913e-04ab3e6b4160@huawei.com> <1d0e15ab-4a1f-0820-26c2-4b9949164dfa@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1d0e15ab-4a1f-0820-26c2-4b9949164dfa@huawei.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6EDA3D02DFB4 X-Stat-Signature: umu7zoss7mwk1y1e9et4uxyo916535tp Authentication-Results: imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com header.s=susede1 header.b=ikIlgBpZ; spf=pass (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of mhocko@suse.com designates 195.135.220.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mhocko@suse.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=suse.com X-HE-Tag: 1631603167-664071 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue 14-09-21 11:09:47, Miaohe Lin wrote: [...] > So even the Fixes tag should be removed ? I would keep that one there. Fixes tag is useful to frame the scope of the fix. For example when somebody is backporting the commit mentioned in the Fixes tag then a) a lot of follow up patches with Fixes can tell you this won't be an easy ride and you might want to reconsider risks vs. benefit b) it helps to collect follow up fixes more easily. That is a different story from cc: stable which just collects patches and push them to all consumers of the stable branch if they apply. To conclude, the Fixes tag is a generaly useful tag to bind patches together and let people evaluate how important that is while Cc stable is an indication that a fix is serious enough to push to all stable users. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs