From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF71C4320A for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6240860FC0 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:04:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 6240860FC0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id A64DF8D0001; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:04:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id A15006B0072; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:04:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 92A598D0001; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:04:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0018.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.18]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798236B0071 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 08:04:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin32.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271F018099213 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:04:28 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78462667416.32.EF9BE9B Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F487003BFD for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6127D60F55; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:04:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1628683466; bh=1/ul8lTpnB4T++xzDF3kRFrA2xyEls7zKujxDteqWws=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=EVoRi/drbZA10GqMWQqMmCoGAgW4Royyy0CA+6YNMUfjh0ivQaLCh9tX9suVJWJhQ DHwrdzBb+C3sDOcDa7hs/wGTbPlX7jTnhKThl1cLojTXdv/nywsx5dinAFS8ml7Qpe 6M548VZLJmoJwx1UJlLzoKqbPE0VldIiADMotoUf986q2t8pTy8S6ntOBUqtTWyPHQ 4TfSQ2U4+U9Bevg+AIfxFDiOW3awR2RdFk65K/GAoYfjcDynTwnD9x+mjr5wb3uKdx rmWZZ+roqwqo8cE+AlXBnZ1jNmJwsqt5XH6EaPIFkg1uGUBH6QAfRro3yE0VetTfKT v/W01nfpUVP8A== Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:04:21 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Vineet Gupta Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Anshuman Khandual Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] ARC: mm: Enable STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS Message-ID: References: <20210811004258.138075-1-vgupta@kernel.org> <20210811004258.138075-7-vgupta@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210811004258.138075-7-vgupta@kernel.org> Authentication-Results: imf02.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b="EVoRi/dr"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf02.hostedemail.com: domain of rppt@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@kernel.org X-Stat-Signature: nz95x1bpk3dtc399cqmtekc9ar8tx8y1 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C6F487003BFD X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-HE-Tag: 1628683467-999883 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 05:42:46PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > In the past I've refrained from doing this (atleast 2 times) due to the ^ at least > slight code bloat due to ABI implications of pte_t etc becoming sttuct ^ struct > > Per ARC ABI, functions return struct via memory and not through register > r0, even if the struct would fits in register(s) ^ fit > > - caller allocates space on stack and passes the address as first arg > (r0), shifting rest of args by one > > - callee creates return struct in memory (referenced via r0) > > This time around the code actually shrunk slightly (due to subtle > inlining heuristic effects), but still slightly inefficient due to > return values passed through memory. That however seems like a small Out of curiosity, is this actually measurable on real world applications? > cost compared to maintenance burden given the impending new mmu support > for page walk etc > > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta > --- > arch/arc/include/asm/page.h | 26 -------------------------- > arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h > index 4a9d33372fe2..c4ac827379cd 100644 > --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h > +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h > @@ -34,12 +34,6 @@ void copy_user_highpage(struct page *to, struct page *from, > unsigned long u_vaddr, struct vm_area_struct *vma); > void clear_user_page(void *to, unsigned long u_vaddr, struct page *page); > > -#undef STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS > - > -#ifdef STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS > -/* > - * These are used to make use of C type-checking.. > - */ > typedef struct { > #ifdef CONFIG_ARC_HAS_PAE40 > unsigned long long pte; > @@ -64,26 +58,6 @@ typedef struct { > > #define pte_pgprot(x) __pgprot(pte_val(x)) > > -#else /* !STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS */ > - > -#ifdef CONFIG_ARC_HAS_PAE40 > -typedef unsigned long long pte_t; > -#else > -typedef unsigned long pte_t; > -#endif > -typedef unsigned long pgd_t; > -typedef unsigned long pgprot_t; > - > -#define pte_val(x) (x) > -#define pgd_val(x) (x) > -#define pgprot_val(x) (x) > -#define __pte(x) (x) > -#define __pgd(x) (x) > -#define __pgprot(x) (x) > -#define pte_pgprot(x) (x) > - > -#endif > - > typedef pte_t * pgtable_t; > > /* > diff --git a/arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c > index 95c649fbc95a..052bbd8b1e5f 100644 > --- a/arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c > +++ b/arch/arc/mm/ioremap.c > @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ void __iomem *ioremap(phys_addr_t paddr, unsigned long size) > if (arc_uncached_addr_space(paddr)) > return (void __iomem *)(u32)paddr; > > - return ioremap_prot(paddr, size, PAGE_KERNEL_NO_CACHE); > + return ioremap_prot(paddr, size, pgprot_val(PAGE_KERNEL_NO_CACHE)); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ioremap); > > -- > 2.25.1 > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.