From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: yee.lee@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
wsd_upstream@mediatek.com, nicholas.Tang@mediatek.com,
Kuan-Ying.lee@mediatek.com, chinwen.chang@mediatek.com,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"open list:SLAB ALLOCATOR" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mm: introduce helper to check slub_debug_enabled
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 08:51:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOKsC75kJfCZwySD@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOJ6aPuNOtzjVhBC@casper.infradead.org>
On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 04:20AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 10:40:57AM +0800, yee.lee@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> >
> > Introduce a helper to check slub_debug_enabled, so that we can confine
> > the use of #ifdef to the definition of the slub_debug_enabled_unlikely()
> > helper.
>
> We don't usually embed '_unlikely' in function names; we
> just do:
>
> static inline bool slub_debug_enabled(void)
> {
> return static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled);
> }
The names are identical, this obviously won't work:
In file included from mm/slub.c:21:
mm/slab.h:219:20: error: ‘slub_debug_enabled’ redeclared as different kind of symbol
219 | static inline bool slub_debug_enabled(void)
But it seems that someone had the same idea, and this merge window got a
__slub_debug_enabled() with 792702911f58.
Yee, can you replace this patch with the below:
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 20:56:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mm: move helper to check slub_debug_enabled
Move the helper to check slub_debug_enabled, so that we can confine
the use of #ifdef outside slub.c as well.
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v6:
* Move helper instead of introducing a new one.
---
mm/slab.h | 15 +++++++++++----
mm/slub.c | 14 --------------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index 67e06637ff2e..f997fd5e42c8 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -216,10 +216,18 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(slub_debug_enabled);
#endif
extern void print_tracking(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object);
long validate_slab_cache(struct kmem_cache *s);
+static inline bool __slub_debug_enabled(void)
+{
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled);
+}
#else
static inline void print_tracking(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
{
}
+static inline bool __slub_debug_enabled(void)
+{
+ return false;
+}
#endif
/*
@@ -229,11 +237,10 @@ static inline void print_tracking(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
*/
static inline bool kmem_cache_debug_flags(struct kmem_cache *s, slab_flags_t flags)
{
-#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
- VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS));
- if (static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled))
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG))
+ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & SLAB_DEBUG_FLAGS));
+ if (__slub_debug_enabled())
return s->flags & flags;
-#endif
return false;
}
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 2ee43ff667a5..090fa14628f9 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -119,25 +119,11 @@
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(slub_debug_enabled);
#else
DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(slub_debug_enabled);
#endif
-
-static inline bool __slub_debug_enabled(void)
-{
- return static_branch_unlikely(&slub_debug_enabled);
-}
-
-#else /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG */
-
-static inline bool __slub_debug_enabled(void)
-{
- return false;
-}
-
#endif /* CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG */
static inline bool kmem_cache_debug(struct kmem_cache *s)
--
2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-05 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210705024101.1567-1-yee.lee@mediatek.com>
2021-07-05 2:40 ` yee.lee
2021-07-05 3:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-07-05 6:51 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2021-07-05 2:40 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] kasan: Add memzero int for unaligned size at DEBUG yee.lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YOKsC75kJfCZwySD@elver.google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=Kuan-Ying.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chinwen.chang@mediatek.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nicholas.Tang@mediatek.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=yee.lee@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox