From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"glider@google.com" <glider@google.com>,
"dvyukov@google.com" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"kasan-dev@googlegroups.com" <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kfence: use TASK_IDLE when awaiting allocation
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 11:47:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YKeBvR0sZGTqX4fG@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc14f4f1a3874e55bef033246768a775@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 09:39AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Marco Elver
> > Sent: 21 May 2021 09:32
> >
> > Since wait_event() uses TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE by default, waiting for an
> > allocation counts towards load. However, for KFENCE, this does not make
> > any sense, since there is no busy work we're awaiting.
> >
> > Instead, use TASK_IDLE via wait_event_idle() to not count towards load.
>
> Doesn't that let the process be interruptible by a signal.
> Which is probably not desirable.
>
> There really ought to be a way of sleeping with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
> without changing the load-average.
That's what TASK_IDLE is:
include/linux/sched.h:#define TASK_IDLE (TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE | TASK_NOLOAD)
See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/alpine.LFD.2.11.1505112154420.1749@ja.home.ssi.bg/T/
Thanks,
-- Marco
> IIRC the load-average is really intended to include processes
> that are waiting for disk - especially for swap.
>
> David
>
> -
> Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
> Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 8:32 Marco Elver
2021-05-21 9:37 ` Hillf Danton
2021-05-21 11:17 ` Marco Elver
2021-05-21 9:39 ` David Laight
2021-05-21 9:47 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2021-05-21 10:15 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YKeBvR0sZGTqX4fG@elver.google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox