From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75360C43460 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:12:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E95361185 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:12:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1E95361185 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 9D99F8D0010; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:12:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 9B0B08D0001; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:12:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 879708D0010; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:12:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0246.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.246]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BF08D0001 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:12:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin09.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004E3180AD830 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:12:37 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78153937596.09.E260819 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79742A000385 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6807611BF; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:12:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1621332756; bh=mUXsR79wmLIkPRrRfbJYCzCHqZYq96n8PXBff+Lbslw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AEGcix5mHkZX7LXPsFxD7YBlUTAN1b2dng5CXXe5sL0s5K0BKqJQ415ENIIoRiG2U qlZWCx9w8F//FWoQtrmXY7JfNA9/DxLxJQ0lT2YVUOCuJjaPVIRcIDMX9tgxJciHEu UnTkuWLNV9v8RYxIrP9TIo97FFcSo8ZLm7glGbTZ3hUd6qRBiYHJULJF1ANce9O9+3 S7T4psKpNPNUGMbwNZBVrYIWkHTFttvX7gOoYdHys5ev28sEdUKUoYDberq1wDPBhC vg/9Ls/BBRjaU2LTvltkkLsBrow5339nXkpZATACv7sdmOeWz4JZ4FvqJAjMkLGZoD sQmqaAZtmYUFA== Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:12:30 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Dong Aisheng Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dongas86@gmail.com, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/sparse: move mem_sections allocation out of memory_present() Message-ID: References: <20210517112044.233138-1-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> <20210517112044.233138-4-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210517112044.233138-4-aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=AEGcix5m; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of rppt@kernel.org designates 198.145.29.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rppt@kernel.org X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 79742A000385 X-Stat-Signature: z8x15ytikcbpruzoptjq7bf1fkyqjxdj X-HE-Tag: 1621332755-470602 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 07:20:42PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > The only path to call memory_present() is from memblocks_present(). > The struct mem_section **mem_section only needs to be initialized once, > so no need put the initialization/allocation code in memory_present() > which will be called multiple times for each section. > > After moving, the 'unlikely' condition statement becomes to be > meaningless as it's only initialized one time, so dropped as well. > > Cc: Andrew Morton > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > --- > mm/sparse.c | 23 ++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c > index 98bfacc763da..df4418c12f04 100644 > --- a/mm/sparse.c > +++ b/mm/sparse.c > @@ -254,19 +254,6 @@ static void __init memory_present(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long en > { > unsigned long pfn; > > -#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME > - if (unlikely(!mem_section)) { > - unsigned long size, align; > - > - size = sizeof(struct mem_section *) * NR_SECTION_ROOTS; > - align = 1 << (INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT); > - mem_section = memblock_alloc(size, align); > - if (!mem_section) > - panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx\n", > - __func__, size, align); > - } > -#endif Maybe split this into a helper function and call it directly from sparse_init()? > - > start &= PAGE_SECTION_MASK; > mminit_validate_memmodel_limits(&start, &end); > for (pfn = start; pfn < end; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) { > @@ -292,9 +279,19 @@ static void __init memory_present(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long en > */ > static void __init memblocks_present(void) > { > + unsigned long __maybe_unused size, align; > unsigned long start, end; > int i, nid; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME > + size = sizeof(struct mem_section *) * NR_SECTION_ROOTS; > + align = 1 << (INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT); > + mem_section = memblock_alloc(size, align); > + if (!mem_section) > + panic("%s: Failed to allocate %lu bytes align=0x%lx\n", > + __func__, size, align); > +#endif > + > for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, &nid) > memory_present(nid, start, end); > } > -- > 2.25.1 > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.