From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54CBC433ED for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CFA6112F for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:56:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 59CFA6112F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id B5BFC6B006C; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B0CD76B006E; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:56:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 9862B6B0070; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:56:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0124.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.124]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8566B006C for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin03.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E2B180ACEF0 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:56:54 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78107025948.03.4781E62 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf25.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE3C6000128 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 11:56:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=FJVYW0nVvzqzV0WuVSs2TE+406TDgUZdxaAg4wu6QtQ=; b=nJLzibjO7NeYl3c8yjFLSafo+H nPW9d5mpe6/UtkdfbkiY8dlbuJiyUAJVhUDchJ0hrxMm6YWssSXl8nm8yx1w6e6SD8ASz+bx15rJX lNU2/cH5dLiCzBV/LtxSgGkrZeoL5kizOm5brfC1OOfnmvue+nHegEoUBa+gk3hKb1pRGZNob7b/H ECFF+QqD6WpyPg7PPCh3pPs70ro2wTZBa2OgYya5a0j4wDd/ue8jYhDtmZrpOQoUSP4PkFRDrds5m rU07lsDHCE3TGxxbc86eji6Ptn1c4tWQ/Vn2zzzOlRFOZIh+ar/V+ZaKq9VGyC2tigC9Vjs2c5pSy u5NjT/4Q==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1leG8X-000HUJ-AN; Wed, 05 May 2021 11:56:28 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970023001CD; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:56:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 238D92B73EFF8; Wed, 5 May 2021 13:56:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 13:56:16 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Rick Edgecombe , dave.hansen@intel.com, luto@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, rppt@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/9] PKS write protected page tables Message-ID: References: <20210505003032.489164-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CCE3C6000128 X-Stat-Signature: shggaqnb8b67pcgus7n3yibr3h38tmmq Authentication-Results: imf25.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=nJLzibjO; spf=none (imf25.hostedemail.com: domain of peterz@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=peterz@infradead.org; dmarc=none Received-SPF: none (infradead.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf25; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=casper.infradead.org; client-ip=90.155.50.34 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1620215806-941936 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 01:08:35PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 5/5/21 2:30 AM, Rick Edgecombe wrote: > > Why use PKS for this? > > ===================== > > PKS is an upcoming CPU feature that allows supervisor virtual memory > > permissions to be changed without flushing the TLB, like PKU does for user > > memory. Protecting page tables would normally be really expensive because you > > would have to do it with paging itself. PKS helps by providing a way to toggle > > the writability of the page tables with just a per-cpu MSR. > > I can see in patch 8/9 that you are flipping the MSR around individual > operations on page table entries. In my patch I hooked making the page table > writable to obtaining the page table lock (IIRC I had only the PTE level fully > handled though). Wonder if that would be better tradeoff even for your MSR approach? There's also the HIGHPTE code we could abuse to kmap an alias while we're at it.