From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C757FC433B4 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFFA6141E for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:37:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5DFFA6141E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E37A16B0036; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:37:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E0FF46B006E; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:37:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C612B6B0070; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:37:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0073.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.73]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911966B0036 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:37:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin15.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D98E180397B8 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:37:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78140241060.15.87CA1E1 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7970240002E1 for ; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:37:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=XNun8oTMQZMoUdApTbcm2jZivlJuomdOXiFmXBYhctg=; b=kLH1L+Dzrp7b3zuNybr327vObB D2kzIl4ZatoesCrtADWi0TvuKx/S6mvichGy2v+iahvbtp1vYI3IC2Ag+1q4kbfE77fnu6YeNzdju mC4/Oj6LpDO+pOpMREuB3WQLC8mhqKxEi8L3vdPwzCE8WaVqZ+80GfhXEvzdpQ6Y5/1oEYYc3fxWv HdD/V1O1ZwHzHPKkuZJSk1hSonNlvCv8VFG9MkNMNo89HL8hne0vqd48ZWE7hJUkLHLf7wB71/EZl K0oprd9ocWWDlpzo4D7/ignae42v3mA9Xbo5l9HJbI3F3m8YwNKoEmkzaU2wQBOJFcxGbYowjkyfD gm4vpgyA==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lhZq1-00AUHO-9Y; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:35:09 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9A8A30001C; Fri, 14 May 2021 17:34:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91EBD20298BDE; Fri, 14 May 2021 17:34:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 17:34:52 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Liam Howlett Cc: "maple-tree@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , Song Liu , Davidlohr Bueso , "Paul E . McKenney" , Matthew Wilcox , Laurent Dufour , David Rientjes , Axel Rasmussen , Suren Baghdasaryan , Vlastimil Babka , Rik van Riel , Michel Lespinasse Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/94] Maple Tree: Add new data structure Message-ID: References: <20210428153542.2814175-1-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com> <20210428153542.2814175-27-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: imf10.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=infradead.org header.s=casper.20170209 header.b=kLH1L+Dz; spf=none (imf10.hostedemail.com: domain of peterz@infradead.org has no SPF policy when checking 90.155.50.34) smtp.mailfrom=peterz@infradead.org; dmarc=none X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7970240002E1 X-Stat-Signature: uehagc9ndysemqqbat4a8z1ebbhk9jb1 X-HE-Tag: 1621006648-103587 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 05:32:15PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 03:36:02PM +0000, Liam Howlett wrote: > > +static inline unsigned long mte_pivot(const struct maple_enode *mn, > > + unsigned char piv) > > +{ > > + struct maple_node *node = mte_to_node(mn); > > + > > + switch (mte_node_type(mn)) { > > + case maple_arange_64: > > + return node->ma64.pivot[piv]; > > + case maple_range_64: > > + case maple_leaf_64: > > + return node->mr64.pivot[piv]; > > + case maple_dense: > > + default: > > + return 0; > > + } > > +} Why is @piv 'unsigned char' ? Does that actually generate better code on any architecture? At the same time; there's no bounds check.