From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E611C433B4 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:03:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC92161452 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:03:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CC92161452 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 107B86B006C; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:03:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 0C2FD6B006E; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:03:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id E9B126B0070; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:03:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0126.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.126]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2366B006C for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:03:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836561801A230 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:03:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78060019716.21.3C5F6DF Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf19.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDD69001158 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:03:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1619096614; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UMX8rj+pcEc6/XojbFh62HaWVLwaQEd+1bKoCKxPFkA=; b=Eu4e4G6peBU/rnxHUzFMyC1GmuKI7w8Ttf5/JJQZoHGIN/Vzgt+t7xGDt530g9IcWHK8CX 6SF5E09+5SSGaRC60AFwhLRKzDQzaJ4LTbm2n5WdPSJxCRXom5fJv/daUbrJK3szXxXtry 8GpzcnWumcC/56MaWDVO/TkkB7EjKao= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34179B016; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:03:33 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: peter enderborg Cc: Shakeel Butt , Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Linux MM , Andrew Morton , Cgroups , David Rientjes , LKML , Suren Baghdasaryan , Greg Thelen , Dragos Sbirlea , Priya Duraisamy Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Android OOM helper proof of concept Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5CDD69001158 X-Stat-Signature: c8fpp4dj69mwtb8wiq47tb4c5izi7ksx Received-SPF: none (suse.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf19; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mx2.suse.de; client-ip=195.135.220.15 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1619096591-502331 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu 22-04-21 14:33:45, peter enderborg wrote: [...] > I think we very much need a OOM killer that can help out, > but it is essential that it also play with android rules. This is completely off topic to the discussion here. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs