From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B01C433ED for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D37161354 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:25:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1D37161354 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6A5826B006C; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:25:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 655656B006E; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:25:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4F5E86B0070; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:25:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0216.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.216]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E126B006C for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:25:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin05.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEA28249980 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:25:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78053118822.05.084A6C8 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147F540002C8 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 982F161264; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:25:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1618932310; bh=MAjswkG1d6uIfyIvGoPH2JcXnT5VvPujn7l2uT7Uvj4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=XWMQKAMU43ygxwHm/tIVp+WpJQapUl0Kd60x6HPlbDjcKHnf74tigDwWzGVjUZtAA tSdT+jZGx+d3ZPsKLu+jqBEA39bKT+7+0vr0dhyxEZGCpGlPxkgZ97678lO8WgGG4d QgW3tLOkl5mV+MxGBxxN5j8RAFrxIUGHaYegouiIHqIGoy34Dvfl8diR65SAtnm2sr Lmm/xaDLwYIOcOCnrqMkGqhYpZmIddlqTjCcrJUYJP4M5Cr95OivNBA3jWrHSClyG2 NlCodhM9dvGtr9D03VRf+IlIRcvRBQbVUFXaCEmYNLH08BeSOZ5UALddCrzzC0+Eer T0ouGAFTRdlJA== Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:25:01 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Anshuman Khandual , Ard Biesheuvel , Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , Mark Rutland , Mike Rapoport , Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Message-ID: References: <20210420090925.7457-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20210420090925.7457-3-rppt@kernel.org> <45a7e13d-3e44-3b94-a253-2df72649a83d@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45a7e13d-3e44-3b94-a253-2df72649a83d@redhat.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 147F540002C8 X-Stat-Signature: d45chgj5xe3sx81c3f5zjhz6e8wq83rq Received-SPF: none (kernel.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf02; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail.kernel.org; client-ip=198.145.29.99 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1618932288-506074 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:18:55PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 20.04.21 17:03, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:56:28PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 20.04.21 11:09, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > From: Mike Rapoport > > > > > > > > The struct pages representing a reserved memory region are initialized > > > > using reserve_bootmem_range() function. This function is called for each > > > > reserved region just before the memory is freed from memblock to the buddy > > > > page allocator. > > > > > > > > The struct pages for MEMBLOCK_NOMAP regions are kept with the default > > > > values set by the memory map initialization which makes it necessary to > > > > have a special treatment for such pages in pfn_valid() and > > > > pfn_valid_within(). > > > > > > Just a general question while thinking about it: > > > > > > Would we right now initialize the memmap of these pages already via > > > memmap_init_zone()->memmap_init_range()? (IOW, not marking the > > > PageReserved?) > > > > Yep. These pages are part of memblock.memory so they are initialized in > > memmap_init_zone()->memmap_init_range() to the default values. > > > > So instead of fully initializing them again, we mostly would only have to > set PageReserved(). Not sure how big that memory usually is -- IOW, if we > really care about optimizing the double-init. IIUC, these are small areas reserved by the firmware, like e.g. ACPI tables. @Ard, am I right? -- Sincerely yours, Mike.