linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid()
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:57:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YH7P0J4+1erJK7v5@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f900f889-f059-7d48-dfc7-145c8cd54cf6@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:22:53AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 20.04.21 11:09, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Add comment describing the semantics of pfn_valid() that clarifies that
> > pfn_valid() only checks for availability of a memory map entry (i.e. struct
> > page) for a PFN rather than availability of usable memory backing that PFN.
> > 
> > The most "generic" version of pfn_valid() used by the configurations with
> > SPARSEMEM enabled resides in include/linux/mmzone.h so this is the most
> > suitable place for documentation about semantics of pfn_valid().
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/mmzone.h | 11 +++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > index 47946cec7584..961f0eeefb62 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> > @@ -1410,6 +1410,17 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
> >   #endif
> >   #ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
> > +/**
> > + * pfn_valid - check if there is a valid memory map entry for a PFN
> > + * @pfn: the page frame number to check
> > + *
> > + * Check if there is a valid memory map entry aka struct page for the @pfn.
> > + * Note, that availability of the memory map entry does not imply that
> > + * there is actual usable memory at that @pfn. The struct page may
> > + * represent a hole or an unusable page frame.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise
> > + */
> >   static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
> >   {
> >   	struct mem_section *ms;
> > 
> 
> I'd rephrase all "there is a valid memory map" to "there is a memory map"
> and add "pfn_valid() does to indicate whether the memory map as actually
> initialized -- see pfn_to_online_page()."
> 
> pfn_valid() means that we can do a pfn_to_page() and don't get a fault when
> accessing the "struct page". It doesn't state anything about the content.

Well, I mean valid in the sense you can access the struct page :)
How about:

/**
 * pfn_valid - check if there is a memory map entry for a PFN
 * @pfn: the page frame number to check
 *
 * Check if there is a memory map entry aka struct page for the @pfn and it
 * is safe to access that struct page; the struct page state may be
 * uninitialized -- see pfn_to_online_page().
 *
 * Note, that availability of the memory map entry does not imply that
 * there is actual usable memory at that @pfn. The struct page may
 * represent a hole or an unusable page frame.
 *
 * Return: 1 for PFNs that have memory map entries and 0 otherwise.
 */

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-20 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20  9:09 [PATCH v1 0/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20  9:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] include/linux/mmzone.h: add documentation for pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20  9:22   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 12:57     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2021-04-20 12:58       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20  9:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] memblock: update initialization of reserved pages Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 13:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 15:03     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 15:18       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-20 15:25         ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20  9:09 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: decouple check whether pfn is in linear map from pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 15:57   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21  5:32     ` Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20  9:09 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] arm64: drop pfn_valid_within() and simplify pfn_valid() Mike Rapoport
2021-04-20 16:00   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-04-21  5:52     ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YH7P0J4+1erJK7v5@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox