From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE101C433B4 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 05:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1C6613C7 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 05:09:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8B1C6613C7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D6A856B007E; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:09:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D419C6B0080; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:09:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BBBB36B0081; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:09:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0149.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.149]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2D66B007E for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:09:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C220180ACEE4 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 05:09:35 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78000764310.25.327D63A Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf30.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABF6E000107 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 05:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20F396139B; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 05:09:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1617685774; bh=b/ekTIqAkKQJ1OdjUrtAk59X/tXIbJWTlvoQpbRbxR8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=uT1/KSK2sFi5RtJ8n9BPTy5vN27fJ59O935Ajz07sZYrvrpI/t9tsz+zyytnVmmI6 cEt3OgQqDVP8Y182eahKg1piI3mxrt+yP+WOzNN9qe7EMHBu/PgRpxwfScC1rgUuO3 YwxZ7BFSVuk6tWsnAOahdHmvN4qroP8rIHUozCzT/GQllOy3cjP/Ykr269vM+EdZxm GbTguMXLXShGsynkYVYboWoSddAYz2noejxaOogl/TyOFm+k54Jbx4rozAWBMk5vIa S8xHkIOnxwsAUIqWul9UXd7DkiT3ubFVnk50HhhtA/ddGmIhuHxrqk9KEwXBQp7yq6 RLGuqXFewxgAw== Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 10:39:29 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: kernel test robot Cc: Steen Hegelund , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Linux Memory Management List , Bjarni Jonasson , Andrew Lunn , Alexandre Belloni , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Lars Povlsen , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: fix resource_size.cocci warnings Message-ID: References: <202103190711.pUzuZRzG-lkp@intel.com> <20210318232844.GA65886@63b0c5462fda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210318232844.GA65886@63b0c5462fda> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0ABF6E000107 X-Stat-Signature: s7d8scogxqodsrzwzqdhmoc14deqy7w7 Received-SPF: none (kernel.org>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf30; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mail.kernel.org; client-ip=198.145.29.99 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1617685769-362990 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 19-03-21, 07:28, kernel test robot wrote: > From: kernel test robot > > drivers/phy/microchip/sparx5_serdes.c:2440:54-57: ERROR: Missing resource_size with iores > > > Use resource_size function on resource object > instead of explicit computation. > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/resource_size.cocci Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod