linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] hugetlb: change free_pool_huge_page to remove_pool_huge_page
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:06:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGLcBhP1dt2Fuhph@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210329232402.575396-7-mike.kravetz@oracle.com>

On Mon 29-03-21 16:24:00, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> free_pool_huge_page was called with hugetlb_lock held.  It would remove
> a hugetlb page, and then free the corresponding pages to the lower level
> allocators such as buddy.  free_pool_huge_page was called in a loop to
> remove hugetlb pages and these loops could hold the hugetlb_lock for a
> considerable time.
> 
> Create new routine remove_pool_huge_page to replace free_pool_huge_page.
> remove_pool_huge_page will remove the hugetlb page, and it must be
> called with the hugetlb_lock held.  It will return the removed page and
> it is the responsibility of the caller to free the page to the lower
> level allocators.  The hugetlb_lock is dropped before freeing to these
> allocators which results in shorter lock hold times.
> 
> Add new helper routine to call update_and_free_page for a list of pages.
> 
> Note: Some changes to the routine return_unused_surplus_pages are in
> need of explanation.  Commit e5bbc8a6c992 ("mm/hugetlb.c: fix reservation
> race when freeing surplus pages") modified this routine to address a
> race which could occur when dropping the hugetlb_lock in the loop that
> removes pool pages.  Accounting changes introduced in that commit were
> subtle and took some thought to understand.  This commit removes the
> cond_resched_lock() and the potential race.  Therefore, remove the
> subtle code and restore the more straight forward accounting effectively
> reverting the commit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>

Please drop INIT_LIST_HEAD which seems to be a left over from rebasing
to use LIST_HEAD.

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index dec7bd0dc63d..d3f3cb8766b8 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ static int hstate_next_node_to_alloc(struct hstate *h,
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * helper for free_pool_huge_page() - return the previously saved
> + * helper for remove_pool_huge_page() - return the previously saved
>   * node ["this node"] from which to free a huge page.  Advance the
>   * next node id whether or not we find a free huge page to free so
>   * that the next attempt to free addresses the next node.
> @@ -1391,6 +1391,16 @@ static void update_and_free_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void update_and_free_pages_bulk(struct hstate *h, struct list_head *list)
> +{
> +	struct page *page, *t_page;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, t_page, list, lru) {
> +		update_and_free_page(h, page);
> +		cond_resched();
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  struct hstate *size_to_hstate(unsigned long size)
>  {
>  	struct hstate *h;
> @@ -1721,16 +1731,18 @@ static int alloc_pool_huge_page(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * Free huge page from pool from next node to free.
> - * Attempt to keep persistent huge pages more or less
> - * balanced over allowed nodes.
> + * Remove huge page from pool from next node to free.  Attempt to keep
> + * persistent huge pages more or less balanced over allowed nodes.
> + * This routine only 'removes' the hugetlb page.  The caller must make
> + * an additional call to free the page to low level allocators.
>   * Called with hugetlb_lock locked.
>   */
> -static int free_pool_huge_page(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
> -							 bool acct_surplus)
> +static struct page *remove_pool_huge_page(struct hstate *h,
> +						nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
> +						 bool acct_surplus)
>  {
>  	int nr_nodes, node;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	struct page *page = NULL;
>  
>  	for_each_node_mask_to_free(h, nr_nodes, node, nodes_allowed) {
>  		/*
> @@ -1739,23 +1751,14 @@ static int free_pool_huge_page(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
>  		 */
>  		if ((!acct_surplus || h->surplus_huge_pages_node[node]) &&
>  		    !list_empty(&h->hugepage_freelists[node])) {
> -			struct page *page =
> -				list_entry(h->hugepage_freelists[node].next,
> +			page = list_entry(h->hugepage_freelists[node].next,
>  					  struct page, lru);
>  			remove_hugetlb_page(h, page, acct_surplus);
> -			/*
> -			 * unlock/lock around update_and_free_page is temporary
> -			 * and will be removed with subsequent patch.
> -			 */
> -			spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> -			update_and_free_page(h, page);
> -			spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> -			ret = 1;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return page;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2075,17 +2078,16 @@ static int gather_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h, long delta)
>   *    to the associated reservation map.
>   * 2) Free any unused surplus pages that may have been allocated to satisfy
>   *    the reservation.  As many as unused_resv_pages may be freed.
> - *
> - * Called with hugetlb_lock held.  However, the lock could be dropped (and
> - * reacquired) during calls to cond_resched_lock.  Whenever dropping the lock,
> - * we must make sure nobody else can claim pages we are in the process of
> - * freeing.  Do this by ensuring resv_huge_page always is greater than the
> - * number of huge pages we plan to free when dropping the lock.
>   */
>  static void return_unused_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h,
>  					unsigned long unused_resv_pages)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr_pages;
> +	struct page *page;
> +	LIST_HEAD(page_list);
> +
> +	/* Uncommit the reservation */
> +	h->resv_huge_pages -= unused_resv_pages;
>  
>  	/* Cannot return gigantic pages currently */
>  	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> @@ -2102,24 +2104,22 @@ static void return_unused_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h,
>  	 * evenly across all nodes with memory. Iterate across these nodes
>  	 * until we can no longer free unreserved surplus pages. This occurs
>  	 * when the nodes with surplus pages have no free pages.
> -	 * free_pool_huge_page() will balance the freed pages across the
> +	 * remove_pool_huge_page() will balance the freed pages across the
>  	 * on-line nodes with memory and will handle the hstate accounting.
> -	 *
> -	 * Note that we decrement resv_huge_pages as we free the pages.  If
> -	 * we drop the lock, resv_huge_pages will still be sufficiently large
> -	 * to cover subsequent pages we may free.
>  	 */
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page_list);
>  	while (nr_pages--) {
> -		h->resv_huge_pages--;
> -		unused_resv_pages--;
> -		if (!free_pool_huge_page(h, &node_states[N_MEMORY], 1))
> +		page = remove_pool_huge_page(h, &node_states[N_MEMORY], 1);
> +		if (!page)
>  			goto out;
> -		cond_resched_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> +		list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> -	/* Fully uncommit the reservation */
> -	h->resv_huge_pages -= unused_resv_pages;
> +	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +	update_and_free_pages_bulk(h, &page_list);
> +	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  }
>  
>  
> @@ -2683,7 +2683,6 @@ static void try_to_free_low(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
>  						nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
>  {
>  	int i;
> -	struct page *page, *next;
>  	LIST_HEAD(page_list);
>  
>  	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> @@ -2694,6 +2693,7 @@ static void try_to_free_low(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
>  	 */
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page_list);
>  	for_each_node_mask(i, *nodes_allowed) {
> +		struct page *page, *next;
>  		struct list_head *freel = &h->hugepage_freelists[i];
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, freel, lru) {
>  			if (count >= h->nr_huge_pages)
> @@ -2707,10 +2707,7 @@ static void try_to_free_low(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count,
>  
>  out:
>  	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> -	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, next, &page_list, lru) {
> -		update_and_free_page(h, page);
> -		cond_resched();
> -	}
> +	update_and_free_pages_bulk(h, &page_list);
>  	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  }
>  #else
> @@ -2757,6 +2754,8 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
>  			      nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
>  {
>  	unsigned long min_count, ret;
> +	struct page *page;
> +	LIST_HEAD(page_list);
>  	NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, node_alloc_noretry, GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2869,11 +2868,23 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
>  	min_count = h->resv_huge_pages + h->nr_huge_pages - h->free_huge_pages;
>  	min_count = max(count, min_count);
>  	try_to_free_low(h, min_count, nodes_allowed);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Collect pages to be removed on list without dropping lock
> +	 */
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page_list);
>  	while (min_count < persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
> -		if (!free_pool_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed, 0))
> +		page = remove_pool_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed, 0);
> +		if (!page)
>  			break;
> -		cond_resched_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> +		list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
>  	}
> +	/* free the pages after dropping lock */
> +	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +	update_and_free_pages_bulk(h, &page_list);
> +	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
>  	while (count < persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
>  		if (!adjust_pool_surplus(h, nodes_allowed, 1))
>  			break;
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-30  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29 23:23 [PATCH v2 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] mm/cma: change cma mutex to irq safe spinlock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  1:13   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-30  1:20   ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-03-30  2:18     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  8:01   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-30  8:08     ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-30  8:17       ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-03-30  8:18       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-30  8:21         ` Muchun Song
2021-03-31  2:37     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] hugetlb: no need to drop hugetlb_lock to call cma_release Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  1:13   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-30  8:01   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] hugetlb: add per-hstate mutex to synchronize user adjustments Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  2:23   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] hugetlb: create remove_hugetlb_page() to separate functionality Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] hugetlb: call update_and_free_page without hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  2:10   ` Miaohe Lin
2021-03-30  2:21   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-31  2:39     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] hugetlb: change free_pool_huge_page to remove_pool_huge_page Mike Kravetz
2021-03-30  2:30   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-30  8:06   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2021-03-29 23:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29 23:24 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] hugetlb: add lockdep_assert_held() calls for hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YGLcBhP1dt2Fuhph@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox