From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E026C433E0 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F5F619FC for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:34:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E5F5F619FC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 7FA9C6B0072; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:34:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 7ABDD6B007B; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:34:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 5AE476B007E; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:34:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0240.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.240]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4B06B0072 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:34:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BEF39B36 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:34:36 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77958642552.08.FF196FD Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B56A0049D3 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:34:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1616682869; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rQyiQpFwMhuD5ITkTwCrWydGje5dIypOBktLJq2OuU4=; b=HY3ZsQQiGnASD2kTsESf4GZkBVpt/IiMrRvrT21gDf2FUntBW4QcETycfPZHQ0NxluwEgV FQbRUF/Ap/dPEPuYJETFeKcp0Dkky3APE75w+vGHTQihF4gKBaXD9Hf9X606kOLgxUA4h7 X9d8ipi2ErjGxzNHrKOXjejp/NtBHlE= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87383ADAA; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:34:28 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Oscar Salvador , Andrew Morton , Anshuman Khandual , Vlastimil Babka , Pavel Tatashin , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] mm,memory_hotplug: Allocate memmap from the added memory range Message-ID: References: <9591a0b8-c000-2f61-67a6-4402678fe50b@redhat.com> <31110e58-c99a-8dee-6f6e-98f456b77759@redhat.com> <062bc5d7-a83c-1c1a-7b77-9f043643f4fa@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <062bc5d7-a83c-1c1a-7b77-9f043643f4fa@redhat.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B5B56A0049D3 X-Stat-Signature: bzp9ejkbzfgjmnahtqx7c6ny9e8ehmks Received-SPF: none (suse.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf07; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mx2.suse.de; client-ip=195.135.220.15 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1616682870-262825 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu 25-03-21 15:09:35, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 25.03.21 15:08, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Thu 25-03-21 13:40:45, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 25.03.21 13:35, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Thu 25-03-21 12:08:43, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > > > On 25.03.21 11:55, Oscar Salvador wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > - When moving the initialization/accounting to hot-add/hot-remove, > > > > > > the section containing the vmemmap pages will remain offline. > > > > > > It might get onlined once the pages get online in online_pages(), > > > > > > or not if vmemmap pages span a whole section. > > > > > > I remember (but maybe David rmemeber better) that that was a problem > > > > > > wrt. pfn_to_online_page() and hybernation/kdump. > > > > > > So, if that is really a problem, we would have to care of ot setting > > > > > > the section to the right state. > > > > > > > > > > Good memory. Indeed, hibernation/kdump won't save the state of the vmemmap, > > > > > because the memory is marked as offline and, thus, logically without any > > > > > valuable content. ^^^^ THIS > > > > > > > > Could you point me to the respective hibernation code please? I always > > > > get lost in that area. Anyway, we do have the same problem even if the > > > > whole accounting is handled during {on,off}lining, no? > > > > > > kernel/power/snapshot.c:saveable_page(). > > > > Thanks! So this is as I've suspected. The very same problem is present > > if the memory block is marked offline. So we need a solution here > > anyway. One way to go would be to consider these vmemmap pages always > > online. pfn_to_online_page would have to special case them but we would > > need to identify them first. I used to have PageVmemmap or something > > like that in my early attempt to do this. > > > > That being said this is not an argument for one or the other aproach. > > Both need fixing. > > Can you elaborate? What is the issue there? What needs fixing? offline section containing vmemmap will be lost during hibernation cycle IIU the above correctly. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs