linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] hugetlb: change free_pool_huge_page to remove_pool_huge_page
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 12:06:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YFxurrhDuZZG1FlQ@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325002835.216118-7-mike.kravetz@oracle.com>

On Wed 24-03-21 17:28:33, Mike Kravetz wrote:
[...]
> @@ -2074,17 +2067,16 @@ static int gather_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h, long delta)
>   *    to the associated reservation map.
>   * 2) Free any unused surplus pages that may have been allocated to satisfy
>   *    the reservation.  As many as unused_resv_pages may be freed.
> - *
> - * Called with hugetlb_lock held.  However, the lock could be dropped (and
> - * reacquired) during calls to cond_resched_lock.  Whenever dropping the lock,
> - * we must make sure nobody else can claim pages we are in the process of
> - * freeing.  Do this by ensuring resv_huge_page always is greater than the
> - * number of huge pages we plan to free when dropping the lock.
>   */
>  static void return_unused_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h,
>  					unsigned long unused_resv_pages)
>  {
>  	unsigned long nr_pages;
> +	struct page *page, *t_page;
> +	struct list_head page_list;
> +
> +	/* Uncommit the reservation */
> +	h->resv_huge_pages -= unused_resv_pages;

Is this ok for cases where remove_pool_huge_page fails early? I have to
say I am kinda lost in the resv_huge_pages accounting here. The original
code was already quite supicious to me. TBH.
>  
>  	/* Cannot return gigantic pages currently */
>  	if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> @@ -2101,24 +2093,27 @@ static void return_unused_surplus_pages(struct hstate *h,
>  	 * evenly across all nodes with memory. Iterate across these nodes
>  	 * until we can no longer free unreserved surplus pages. This occurs
>  	 * when the nodes with surplus pages have no free pages.
> -	 * free_pool_huge_page() will balance the freed pages across the
> +	 * remove_pool_huge_page() will balance the freed pages across the
>  	 * on-line nodes with memory and will handle the hstate accounting.
> -	 *
> -	 * Note that we decrement resv_huge_pages as we free the pages.  If
> -	 * we drop the lock, resv_huge_pages will still be sufficiently large
> -	 * to cover subsequent pages we may free.
>  	 */
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page_list);
>  	while (nr_pages--) {
> -		h->resv_huge_pages--;
> -		unused_resv_pages--;
> -		if (!free_pool_huge_page(h, &node_states[N_MEMORY], 1))
> +		page = remove_pool_huge_page(h, &node_states[N_MEMORY], 1);
> +		if (!page)
>  			goto out;
> -		cond_resched_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);

again unnecessary INIT_LIST_HEAD

> +		list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> -	/* Fully uncommit the reservation */
> -	h->resv_huge_pages -= unused_resv_pages;
> +	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, t_page, &page_list, lru) {
> +		list_del(&page->lru);
> +		update_and_free_page(h, page);
> +		cond_resched();
> +	}

You have the same construct at 3 different places maybe it deserves a
little helper update_and_free_page_batch.

> +	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>  }
>  
>  
> @@ -2648,6 +2643,8 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
>  			      nodemask_t *nodes_allowed)
>  {
>  	unsigned long min_count, ret;
> +	struct page *page, *t_page;
> +	struct list_head page_list;
>  	NODEMASK_ALLOC(nodemask_t, node_alloc_noretry, GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2757,11 +2754,28 @@ static int set_max_huge_pages(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count, int nid,
>  	min_count = h->resv_huge_pages + h->nr_huge_pages - h->free_huge_pages;
>  	min_count = max(count, min_count);
>  	try_to_free_low(h, min_count, nodes_allowed);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Collect pages to be removed on list without dropping lock
> +	 */
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page_list);
>  	while (min_count < persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
> -		if (!free_pool_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed, 0))
> +		page = remove_pool_huge_page(h, nodes_allowed, 0);
> +		if (!page)
>  			break;
> -		cond_resched_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);

INIT_LIST_HEAD again.

> +		list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
>  	}
> +	/* free the pages after dropping lock */
> +	spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(page, t_page, &page_list, lru) {
> +		list_del(&page->lru);
> +		update_and_free_page(h, page);
> +		cond_resched();
> +	}
> +	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
>  	while (count < persistent_huge_pages(h)) {
>  		if (!adjust_pool_surplus(h, nodes_allowed, 1))
>  			break;
> -- 
> 2.30.2

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-25 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-25  0:28 [PATCH 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25  0:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm: cma: introduce cma_release_nowait() Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25  9:39   ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-25  9:45   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-25  9:54     ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-25 10:10       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-25 10:11     ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-25 10:13       ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-25 10:17       ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-25 10:24         ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-25  9:56   ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-25 10:22     ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-25 16:56       ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25 17:15         ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-25 20:12           ` Minchan Kim
2021-03-25 23:19             ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-25 23:49               ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-26 21:32                 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-29  7:46                   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-29 22:27                     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25  0:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm: hugetlb: don't drop hugetlb_lock around cma_release() call Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25  0:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] hugetlb: add per-hstate mutex to synchronize user adjustments Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25 10:47   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-25 12:29   ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-26  1:52   ` Miaohe Lin
2021-03-25  0:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: create remove_hugetlb_page() to separate functionality Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25 10:49   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-26  2:10   ` Miaohe Lin
2021-03-26 19:57     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-27  1:40       ` Miaohe Lin
2021-03-27  6:36   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-25  0:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] hugetlb: call update_and_free_page without hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25 10:55   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-25 17:12     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25 19:39       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-25 20:33         ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-27  6:54   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-28 21:40     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25  0:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] hugetlb: change free_pool_huge_page to remove_pool_huge_page Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25 11:06   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2021-03-25 17:29     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25  0:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25 11:21   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-25 17:32     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-27  7:06   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-29  7:49     ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-29 22:44       ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25  0:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] hugetlb: add lockdep_assert_held() calls for hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-25 11:22   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-26  2:12   ` Miaohe Lin
2021-03-27  8:14   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-03-26  1:42 ` [PATCH 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts Miaohe Lin
2021-03-26 20:00   ` Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YFxurrhDuZZG1FlQ@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox