From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657F1C433C1 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58B861A0A for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:45:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D58B861A0A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 523356B0036; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 05:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4D3F26B006C; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 05:45:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 39BBE6B0070; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 05:45:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0085.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.85]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D72F6B0036 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 05:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2FD180C44C0 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:45:21 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77957913642.24.84830CC Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CA0407F8FA for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:45:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1616665520; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Oedc/H3NO/+XIDe2SVuW1rBJVHajjrgbUCS7N70jjOk=; b=O4nlFbP307bh6WYdedGymTNc9qAjh88PvhssLPuABMHN6+0xJe7+5mdZE8Lz52VR2z7Oed Duy5dFNEjgw364TbeEtRCO2m7YdcAUB6wNbM5/Nke7P/a4f8Qh5L0JMtogCdZSLoG3zLkB XqC3YvjpsXJbXtOCLp5YX4lAeg/FpNg= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE42AC16; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 10:45:18 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Mike Kravetz Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Oscar Salvador , David Hildenbrand , Muchun Song , David Rientjes , Miaohe Lin , Peter Zijlstra , Matthew Wilcox , HORIGUCHI NAOYA , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , Waiman Long , Peter Xu , Mina Almasry , Hillf Danton , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mm: cma: introduce cma_release_nowait() Message-ID: References: <20210325002835.216118-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> <20210325002835.216118-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210325002835.216118-2-mike.kravetz@oracle.com> X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 81CA0407F8FA X-Stat-Signature: iohyqszbxwdunycsz7pa8yda1xyfcsxp Received-SPF: none (suse.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf10; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mx2.suse.de; client-ip=195.135.220.15 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1616665519-110123 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed 24-03-21 17:28:28, Mike Kravetz wrote: [...] > phys_addr_t cma_get_base(const struct cma *cma) > { > return PFN_PHYS(cma->base_pfn); > @@ -146,6 +155,10 @@ static int __init cma_init_reserved_areas(void) > for (i = 0; i < cma_area_count; i++) > cma_activate_area(&cma_areas[i]); > > + cma_release_wq = create_workqueue("cma_release"); Considering the workqueue is used to free up memory it should likely be WQ_MEM_RECLAIM to prevent from long stalls when WQs are overloaded. I cannot judge the CMA parts from a very quick glance this looks reasonably. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs