From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D45CC433DB for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3082D64F53 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:30:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3082D64F53 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BA7E86B0008; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:30:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id B7FA46B000D; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:30:11 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A49306B0023; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:30:11 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0133.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.133]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8920A6B0008 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:30:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin19.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B558249980 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:30:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77882729022.19.A9A3761 Received: from mx2.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DACE005F3E for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:30:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1614875402; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sQN9SAzuKzLYoT1rSq62TVM+z2FHdV17wB6gfhjAs+Y=; b=RWc0jmeryKrVIElTF0ZYzWUy8nKZJLQz84sjQXW+i4wbvNDgrbpaFbIYtkS3gKGI5oHIqs Uka5j7VBKxwvUagHkGulyz2ggGVdUyG+nDypoednBwjCwfTBIpZxWf7QoZbOibPNR3W9D3 TCr65fIsGnKuA4Qon/qFrUVPohH3lg4= Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FCEAD2B; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 16:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:30:00 +0100 From: Anthony Iliopoulos To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jens Axboe , Andrew Morton , Matthew Wilcox , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH STABLE 5.10 5.11] swap: fix swapfile page to sector mapping Message-ID: References: <20210304150824.29878-1-ailiop@suse.com> <20210304150824.29878-5-ailiop@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam03 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 52DACE005F3E X-Stat-Signature: qzuhcfagap3ikarpmqkctxmcfwdycsq1 Received-SPF: none (suse.com>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf05; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=mx2.suse.de; client-ip=195.135.220.15 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1614875409-33935 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 04:16:26PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 04:08:24PM +0100, Anthony Iliopoulos wrote: > > commit caf6912f3f4af7232340d500a4a2008f81b93f14 upstream. > > No, this does not look like that commit. > > Why can I not just take caf6912f3f4a ("swap: fix swapfile read/write > offset") directly for 5.10 and 5.11? WHat has changed to prevent that? You're right of course, the upstream fix applies even on v5.4 so you could just take it directly for those branches if this is preferable. Regards, Anthony