linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Chris Goldsworthy <quic_cgoldswo@quicinc.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <quic_sukadev@quicinc.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
	Georgi Djakov <quic_c_gdjako@quicinc.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc,cma: configurable CMA utilization
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 15:47:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9r6LtMOPHfxr7UL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230201040628.GA3767@hu-cgoldswo-sd.qualcomm.com>

Hi Chris,

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 08:06:28PM -0800, Chris Goldsworthy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 03:59:36PM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:10:01PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:10:40AM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > > Hi Sukadev!
> > > > 
> > > > Can you, please, share a bit more details about your setup? E.g. what is
> > > > the zone size, the cma area size and the value you want to set your sysctl to?
> > > 
> > > Hi Roman,
> > > 
> > > I currently have a device with 8GB Zone normal and 600MB of CMA. We have a
> > > slightly different implementation and use up all the available CMA region.
> > > i.e. going forward, we intend to set the ratio to 100 or even higher.
> 
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> > It means you want allocations be always served from a cma region first?
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> > What's the point of it?
> 
> We're operating in a resource constrained environment, and we want to maximize
> the amount of memory free / headroom for GFP_KERNEL allocations on our SoCs,
> which are especially important for DMA allocations that use an IOMMU. We need a
> large amount of CMA on our SoCs for various reasons (e.g. for devices not
> upstream of an IOMMU), but whilst that CMA memory is not in use, we want to
> route all GFP_MOVABLE allocations to the CMA regions, which will free up memory
> for GFP_KERNEL allocations. 

I like this patch for different reason but for the specific problem you
mentioned, How about making reclaimer/compaction aware of the problem:

IOW, when the GFP_KERNEL/DMA allocation happens but not enough memory
in the zones, let's migrates movable pages in those zones into CMA
area/movable zone if they are plenty of free memory.

I guess you considered but did you observe some problems?

> 
> > The idea behind the current formula is to keep cma regions free if there is
> > a plenty of other free memory, otherwise treat it on par with other memory.
> 
> With the current approach, if we have a large amount of movable memory allocated
> that has not gone into the CMA regions yet, and a DMA use case starts that
> causes the above condition to be met, we would head towards OOM conditions when
> we otherwise could have delayed this with this change.  Note that since we're
> working on Android, there is a daemon built on top of PSI called LMKD that will
> start killing things under memory pressure (before an OOM is actually reached)
> in order to free up memory. This patch should then reduce kills accordingly for
> a better user experience by keeping a larger set of background apps alive. When
> a CMA allocation does occur and pages get migrated out, there is a similar
> reduction in headroom (you probably already know this and know of the FB
> equivalent made by Johannes Weiner). 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-01 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-31  7:10 Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2023-01-31  7:23 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-01-31 14:26 ` Georgi Djakov
2023-01-31 18:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-01-31 20:10   ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2023-01-31 23:59     ` Roman Gushchin
2023-02-01  4:06       ` Chris Goldsworthy
2023-02-01 19:00         ` Roman Gushchin
2023-02-02 20:13           ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2023-02-04  0:04             ` Roman Gushchin
2023-02-01 23:47         ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2023-02-06  5:22           ` Chris Goldsworthy
2023-02-08 22:00             ` Minchan Kim
2024-01-05 23:46           ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2024-01-06  0:05             ` Roman Gushchin
2024-01-08 20:15               ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2024-01-09  2:59                 ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9r6LtMOPHfxr7UL@google.com \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=quic_c_gdjako@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_cgoldswo@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_sukadev@quicinc.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox