From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Chris Goldsworthy <quic_cgoldswo@quicinc.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <quic_sukadev@quicinc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
Georgi Djakov <quic_c_gdjako@quicinc.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,page_alloc,cma: configurable CMA utilization
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 15:47:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9r6LtMOPHfxr7UL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230201040628.GA3767@hu-cgoldswo-sd.qualcomm.com>
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 08:06:28PM -0800, Chris Goldsworthy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 03:59:36PM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:10:01PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:10:40AM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > > Hi Sukadev!
> > > >
> > > > Can you, please, share a bit more details about your setup? E.g. what is
> > > > the zone size, the cma area size and the value you want to set your sysctl to?
> > >
> > > Hi Roman,
> > >
> > > I currently have a device with 8GB Zone normal and 600MB of CMA. We have a
> > > slightly different implementation and use up all the available CMA region.
> > > i.e. going forward, we intend to set the ratio to 100 or even higher.
>
>
> Hi Roman,
>
> > It means you want allocations be always served from a cma region first?
>
> Exactly.
>
> > What's the point of it?
>
> We're operating in a resource constrained environment, and we want to maximize
> the amount of memory free / headroom for GFP_KERNEL allocations on our SoCs,
> which are especially important for DMA allocations that use an IOMMU. We need a
> large amount of CMA on our SoCs for various reasons (e.g. for devices not
> upstream of an IOMMU), but whilst that CMA memory is not in use, we want to
> route all GFP_MOVABLE allocations to the CMA regions, which will free up memory
> for GFP_KERNEL allocations.
I like this patch for different reason but for the specific problem you
mentioned, How about making reclaimer/compaction aware of the problem:
IOW, when the GFP_KERNEL/DMA allocation happens but not enough memory
in the zones, let's migrates movable pages in those zones into CMA
area/movable zone if they are plenty of free memory.
I guess you considered but did you observe some problems?
>
> > The idea behind the current formula is to keep cma regions free if there is
> > a plenty of other free memory, otherwise treat it on par with other memory.
>
> With the current approach, if we have a large amount of movable memory allocated
> that has not gone into the CMA regions yet, and a DMA use case starts that
> causes the above condition to be met, we would head towards OOM conditions when
> we otherwise could have delayed this with this change. Note that since we're
> working on Android, there is a daemon built on top of PSI called LMKD that will
> start killing things under memory pressure (before an OOM is actually reached)
> in order to free up memory. This patch should then reduce kills accordingly for
> a better user experience by keeping a larger set of background apps alive. When
> a CMA allocation does occur and pages get migrated out, there is a similar
> reduction in headroom (you probably already know this and know of the FB
> equivalent made by Johannes Weiner).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-01 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-31 7:10 Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2023-01-31 7:23 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-01-31 14:26 ` Georgi Djakov
2023-01-31 18:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-01-31 20:10 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2023-01-31 23:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-02-01 4:06 ` Chris Goldsworthy
2023-02-01 19:00 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-02-02 20:13 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2023-02-04 0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-02-01 23:47 ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2023-02-06 5:22 ` Chris Goldsworthy
2023-02-08 22:00 ` Minchan Kim
2024-01-05 23:46 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2024-01-06 0:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-01-08 20:15 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2024-01-09 2:59 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9r6LtMOPHfxr7UL@google.com \
--to=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=quic_c_gdjako@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_cgoldswo@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sukadev@quicinc.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox