linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable] lib/Kconfig.debug: do not enable DEBUG_PREEMPT by default
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:43:20 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9O42N9J9gAsbJ6T@hyeyoo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9D7iXUuLsOURfFv@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:51:05AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 26-01-23 00:41:15, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> [...]
> > > Do you happen to have any perf data collected during those runs? I
> > > would be interested in the memcg side of things. Maybe we can do
> > > something better there.
> > 
> > Yes, below is performance data I've collected.
> > 
> > 6.1.8-debug-preempt-dirty
> > =========================
> >   Overhead  Command       Shared Object     Symbol
> > +    9.14%  hackbench        [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] check_preemption_disabled
> 
> Thanks! Could you just add callers that are showing in the profile for
> this call please?

-   14.56%     9.14%  hackbench        [kernel.vmlinux]  [k] check_preemption_disabled                          
   - 6.37% check_preemption_disabled                                                                            
      + 3.48% mod_objcg_state                                                                                   
      + 1.10% obj_cgroup_charge                                                                                 
        1.02% refill_obj_stock                                                                                  
     0.67% memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook                                                                           
     0.58% mod_objcg_state      

According to perf, many memcg functions call this function
and that's because __this_cpu_xxxx checks if preemption is disabled.

in include/linux/percpu-defs.h:

/*
 * Operations for contexts that are safe from preemption/interrupts.  These
 * operations verify that preemption is disabled.
 */
#define __this_cpu_read(pcp)                                            \
({                                                                      \
        __this_cpu_preempt_check("read");                               \
        raw_cpu_read(pcp);                                              \
})

#define __this_cpu_write(pcp, val)                                      \
({                                                                      \
        __this_cpu_preempt_check("write");                              \
        raw_cpu_write(pcp, val);                                        \
})

#define __this_cpu_add(pcp, val)                                        \
({                                                                      \
        __this_cpu_preempt_check("add");                                \
        raw_cpu_add(pcp, val);                                          \
})

in lib/smp_processor_id.c:

noinstr void __this_cpu_preempt_check(const char *op)
{
        check_preemption_disabled("__this_cpu_", op);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__this_cpu_preempt_check);


> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-27 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-21  3:39 Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-21 11:29 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-21 11:54   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-23  8:58     ` Michal Hocko
2023-01-25 15:41       ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-25  9:51         ` Michal Hocko
2023-01-27 11:43           ` Hyeonggon Yoo [this message]
2023-01-27 12:33             ` Michal Hocko
2023-01-23 11:05     ` Christoph Lameter
2023-01-24 16:34       ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-23 14:01 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-26  2:02 ` Roman Gushchin
2023-01-27 11:45   ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-02-02  3:09 ` Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9O42N9J9gAsbJ6T@hyeyoo \
    --to=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dennis@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox