From: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>,
<lkp@intel.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [mm, slub] 0af8489b02: kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:04:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7we1QAnJR3Kp5tU@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7weKyxIY+QFYq6j@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5778 bytes --]
sorry, missed the attachment...
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 10:01:15PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi, Vlastimil,
>
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:13:15AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 1/5/23 02:46, Oliver Sang wrote:
> > > hi, Hyeonggon, hi, Vlastimil,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 06:04:20PM +0900, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:46:33PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> > >> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 11:42:11AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > >> > > So the events leading up to this could be something like:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > - 0x2daee is order-1 slab folio of the inode cache, sitting on the partial list
> > >> > > - despite being on partial list, it's freed ???
> > >> > > - somebody else allocates order-2 page 0x2daec and uses it for whatever,
> > >> > > then frees it
> > >> > > - 0x2daec is reallocated as order-1 slab from names_cache, then freed
> > >> > > - we try to allocate from the slab page 0x2daee and trip on the PageTail
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Except, the freeing of order-2 page would have reset the PageTail and
> > >> > > compound_head in 0x2daec, so this is even more complicated or involves some
> > >> > > extra race?
> > >> >
> > >> > FYI, we ran tests more up to 500 times, then saw different issues but rate is
> > >> > actually low
> > >> >
> > >> > 56d5a2b9ba85a390 0af8489b0216fa1dd83e264bef8
> > >> > ---------------- ---------------------------
> > >> > fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> > >> > | | |
> > >> > :500 12% 61:500 dmesg.invalid_opcode:#[##]
> > >> > :500 3% 14:500 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h
> > >> > :500 3% 17:500 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/page-flags.h
> > >> > :500 5% 26:500 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_lib/list_debug.c
> > >> > :500 0% 2:500 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_mm/page_alloc.c
> > >> > :500 0% 2:500 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_mm/usercopy.c
> > >> >
> > >
> > > hi Vlastimil,
> > >
> > > as you mentioned
> > >> Hm even if rate is low, the different kinds of reports could be useful to
> > >> see, if all of that is caused by the commit.
> > >
> > > we tried to run tests even more times, but with the config which enable
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT
> > > (config is attached as
> > > config-6.1.0-rc2-00014-g0af8489b0216+CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC+CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT
> > > the only diff with previous config is
> > > @@ -5601,7 +5601,8 @@ CONFIG_HAVE_KCSAN_COMPILER=y
> > > # Memory Debugging
> > > #
> > > CONFIG_PAGE_EXTENSION=y
> > > -# CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is not set
> > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y
> > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT=y
> > > CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER=y
> > > # CONFIG_PAGE_POISONING is not set
> > > CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_REF=y
> > > )
> > >
> > > what we found now is some issues are also reproduced on parent now (still by
> > > rcutorture tests here), though seems lower rate on parent.
> > >
> > > =========================================================================================
> > > compiler/kconfig/rootfs/runtime/tbox_group/test/testcase/torture_type:
> > > gcc-11/i386-randconfig-a012-20221226+CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC+CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC_ENABLE_DEFAULT/debian-11.1-i386-20220923.cgz/300s/vm-snb/default/rcutorture/tasks-tracing
> > >
> > > 56d5a2b9ba85a390 0af8489b0216fa1dd83e264bef8
> > > ---------------- ---------------------------
> > > fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
> > > | | |
> > > 8:985 19% 199:990 dmesg.invalid_opcode:#[##]
> > > :985 5% 51:990 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h
> > > 3:985 4% 41:990 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/page-flags.h
> > > 4:985 10% 102:990 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_lib/list_debug.c
> > > :985 0% 2:990 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_mm/page_alloc.c
> > > 1:985 0% 3:990 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_mm/usercopy.c
> > >
> > > however, we noticed dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h still have
> > > relatively high rate on this commit but keeps clean on parent.
> >
> > Well that's interesting. As long as any bugs happen in the parent, it could
> > mean the commit we suspect is just changing the circumstances and creating
> > conditions that increase the bug happening - e.g. because it causes slab
> > pages to be always immediately freed when the last object is freed.
> >
> > So I would be curiou about how some of the reports from the parent look like
> > in detail.
>
> since now we have below 3 also for parent:
> 3:985 4% 41:990 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/page-flags.h
> 4:985 10% 102:990 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_lib/list_debug.c
> 1:985 0% 3:990 dmesg.kernel_BUG_at_mm/usercopy.c
> I pick one dmesg for each case from parent commit (56d5a2b9ba85a390) as
> attached:
> dmesg-parent-bug-at-page-flags-h.xz
> dmesg-parent-bug-at-list_debug-c.xz
> dmesg-parent-bug-at-usercopy-c.xz
> FYI
>
> > And if the rate at the parent (has it increased thanks to the
> > DEBUG_PAGEALLOC?) is sufficient to bisect to the truly first bad commit. Thanks!
>
> got it. Thanks for suggestion!
>
> since 0af8489b02 is based on v6.1-rc2, we will test (both rectorture and boot)
> with same config upon v6.1-rc2 to see if it's really clean there.
> if so we will use dmesg.invalid_opcode:#[##] to trigger new bisect.
>
> will keep you updated. Thanks
>
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #2: dmesg-parent-bug-at-page-flags-h.xz --]
[-- Type: application/x-xz, Size: 57060 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: dmesg-parent-bug-at-list_debug-c.xz --]
[-- Type: application/x-xz, Size: 58640 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #4: dmesg-parent-bug-at-usercopy-c.xz --]
[-- Type: application/x-xz, Size: 55760 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-09 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-31 15:26 kernel test robot
2023-01-01 5:30 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-01 6:50 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-01 7:37 ` supervisor write access in kernel mode in __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-01 11:08 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-01-02 11:17 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-03 10:42 ` [linus:master] [mm, slub] 0af8489b02: kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-03 13:46 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-03 14:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-04 9:04 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-05 1:46 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-05 13:59 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-05 14:47 ` Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-09 14:16 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-06 10:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-09 14:01 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-09 14:04 ` Oliver Sang [this message]
2023-01-10 13:53 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-10 14:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-11 2:26 ` Feng Tang
2023-01-11 10:52 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-12 7:47 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-12 7:56 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-17 7:19 ` Oliver Sang
2023-01-12 8:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-03 15:31 ` A better dump_page() Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-03 23:07 ` David Rientjes
2023-01-03 23:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-05 15:19 ` Vlastimil Babka
2023-01-05 15:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-06 17:28 ` [linus:master] [mm, slub] 0af8489b02: kernel_BUG_at_include/linux/mm.h Hyeonggon Yoo
2023-01-11 9:44 ` BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: f6ffe000 Hyeonggon Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7we1QAnJR3Kp5tU@xsang-OptiPlex-9020 \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox