Re: [PATCH 00/10] docs: cgroup-v1: formatting improv for "Memory Resource Controller" doc

[Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 04:35:20PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > "Memory Resource Controller" CGroup v1 documentation has been in reST
> > since 99c8b231ae6c6c ("docs: cgroup-v1: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst"). The current doc look is kinda ugly, so improve the formatting (only
> > htmldocs is tested).
> >
> > The first patch is a fix for recently reported htmldocs warning, which can
> > be pickup separately from rest of the series.
> >
> > Bagas Sanjaya (10):
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: extend underline of section 8
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: replace custom note constructs with appropriate
> >     admonition blocks
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: wrap remaining admonitions in admonition blocks
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: use code block for locking order schema
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: fix footnotes
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: move hierarchy of accounting caption
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: use bullet lists for list of stat file tables
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: use make swap extension subsections subsections
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: add internal cross-references
> >   docs: cgroup-v1: use numbered lists for user interface setup
> >
> >  .../admin-guide/cgroup-v1/cgroups.rst         |   2 +
> >  .../admin-guide/cgroup-v1/memory.rst          | 290 ++++++++++--------
> >  2 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
> 
> Tejun, do you have an opinion on these?  I'm not really sure we need to
> be tweaking the v1 docs at this point, but I don't see anything in here
> that seems harmful either...

One of the patches doesn't apply because it's against -next (it's
referencing -next sha1 too) and the series feels a bit overly elaborate but,
I mean, why not? I was planning to pick up the series after the holidays
unless you wanna route it through the doc tree.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun