From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+bed15dbf10294aa4f2ae@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [ntfs3?] INFO: task hung in do_user_addr_fault (3)
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 15:37:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7L6PJuMVtEJUsj6@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6383cde5-cf4b-facf-6e07-1378a485657d@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 05:24:24PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Since no lockdep annotation is used for e.g. PG_locked bit, this deadlock
> cannot be detected by lockdep...
lockdep, unfortunately, cannot track PG_locked. Lockdep requires that
the lock is released by the acquirer, and sometimes that's true for
PG_locked, but when it's used to do I/O, the PG_locked bit is released
in interrupt/BH context. We could maybe fake it by pretending we release
the folio lock when we submit the I/O. Then we'll have to figure out
how to tell lockdep that it's OK to grab the folio lock multiple times
(if within the same inode, ordered by folio->index; if in different
inodes, ordered by in-memory address of those inodes), and that
submitting an I/O will unlock all of the folios in that I/O. Oh, but
there's cases where we only submit part of a folio in an I/O, and the
lock will only be released when all of the I/Os targetting that folio
have been completed.
It's not impossible, but it is a lot of work and needs a lot of
understanding of filesystems/mm/io.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-02 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <00000000000060d41f05f139aa44@google.com>
2023-01-02 0:54 ` Hillf Danton
2023-01-02 1:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-02 8:24 ` Tetsuo Handa
2023-01-02 9:41 ` Hillf Danton
2023-01-02 14:05 ` [PATCH] fs/ntfs3: don't hold ni_lock when calling truncate_setsize() Tetsuo Handa
2023-01-02 14:56 ` [syzbot] [ntfs3?] INFO: task hung in do_user_addr_fault (3) syzbot
2023-01-02 15:37 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-01-02 5:27 ` Tetsuo Handa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7L6PJuMVtEJUsj6@casper.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=syzbot+bed15dbf10294aa4f2ae@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox